Suppr超能文献

优先效应:再探讨。

The precedence effect: revisited.

作者信息

Yost W A, Soderquist D R

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Nov;76(5):1377-83. doi: 10.1121/1.391454.

Abstract

The precedence effect, as investigated by Wallach et al. [Am. J. Psychol. 62, 324-336 (1949)] was studied in three experiments. Experiment I was a replication of the original work of Wallach et al. Although the first click pair appears to dominate the perception of the position of the lateral image, the effect of the first click pair does not appear to "offset" or "cancel" the effect of the second click pair in terms of producing a lateral image at midline. The data are consistent with Zurek's [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67, 952-964 (1980)] proposal that the binaural system is less sensitive to the interaural temporal difference of the second click pair. Experiment II indicated that the effect of the first click pair on lateral judgments still dominates that of the second click pair when the images are judged to be off midline. In all of these studies, the variability of the data is quite high. Experiment III showed that the first click pair also led to a larger change in masked thresholds (masking-level differences, MLDs) than does the second click pair. These data reconfirm the use of two-click stimuli for demonstrations of the precedence effect and they describe some of the limitations of the procedure and the generalities of the effect.

摘要

我们通过三个实验研究了由瓦拉赫等人[《美国心理学杂志》62, 324 - 336 (1949)]所探究的优先效应。实验一是对瓦拉赫等人原始研究的重复。尽管第一对咔嗒声似乎主导了对侧向图像位置的感知,但就产生中线处的侧向图像而言,第一对咔嗒声的效应似乎并未“抵消”或“消除”第二对咔嗒声的效应。这些数据与祖雷克[《美国声学学会杂志》67, 952 - 964 (1980)]的观点一致,即双耳系统对第二对咔嗒声的双耳时间差异不太敏感。实验二表明,当判断图像偏离中线时,第一对咔嗒声对侧向判断的影响仍然主导第二对咔嗒声的影响。在所有这些研究中,数据的变异性相当高。实验三表明,第一对咔嗒声也比第二对咔嗒声导致更大的掩蔽阈值变化(掩蔽级差,MLD)。这些数据再次证实了使用双咔嗒声刺激来演示优先效应,并且描述了该程序的一些局限性以及该效应的一般性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验