Strube M J, Turner C W, Cerro D, Stevens J, Hinchey F
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Oct;47(4):839-47. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.47.4.839.
Past research suggests that Type As are more aggressive than Type Bs. However, little is known about the nature of that aggression. The present two studies investigated the theoretical distinction between hostile aggression and instrumental aggression and examined the practical implications of this distinction. Study 1 used a modified version of the Buss teacher-learner procedure that allowed the isolation of hostile from instrumental acts. Results indicated that a prior task frustration produced greater aggression by Type As than Type Bs but only under conditions where the aggressive act could not affect a confederate's immediate performance (i.e., hostile aggression). Study 2 examined the representation of Type As and Type Bs among perpetrators of intrafamily violence. Results indicated that Type As were more likely than Type Bs to exhibit the extreme hostility found in child abuse. Both studies suggest that a lack of control may underlie the greater aggression displayed by Type As than Type Bs.
以往的研究表明,A型人格的人比B型人格的人更具攻击性。然而,对于这种攻击性的本质却知之甚少。目前的两项研究调查了敌意性攻击和工具性攻击之间的理论区别,并探讨了这一区别的实际意义。研究1使用了一种经过修改的巴斯师生程序,该程序能够将敌意行为与工具性行为区分开来。结果表明,先前的任务挫折会使A型人格的人比B型人格的人产生更大的攻击性,但这种情况仅发生在攻击行为不会影响同盟者即时表现的条件下(即敌意性攻击)。研究2调查了家庭暴力实施者中A型人格和B型人格的分布情况。结果表明,与B型人格的人相比,A型人格的人更有可能表现出在虐待儿童中所发现的极端敌意。两项研究均表明,缺乏自控力可能是A型人格的人比B型人格的人表现出更强攻击性的潜在原因。