Levine J D, Gordon N C
Nature. 1984;312(5996):755-6. doi: 10.1038/312755a0.
The appropriate control group in studies of placebo-induced analgesia has not been established. A traditional control has been a 'no treatment' or natural-history group. In some studies, the natural-history group receives a hidden infusion of vehicle, a physiologically inactive substance such as saline solution, to eliminate differences in expectation of the outcome on the part of the experimenter. To evaluate whether 'hidden' as well as open infusion of vehicle can elicit a placebo response, we have now tested a different natural-history group, one which received an infusion of vehicle from a syringe pump controlled by a programmable timer. A comparison of these two control groups provides evidence that hidden infusion of vehicle can elicit a placebo response. Use of this new control group also permitted a clear distinction between a naloxone-antagonizable component of placebo analgesia and naloxone antagonism of endorphin-mediated analgesia induced by surgical stress. Our study underscores the power of the placebo and emphasizes that even the most subtle cues can elicit a placebo response.
在安慰剂诱导镇痛的研究中,尚未确定合适的对照组。传统的对照组是“无治疗”或自然病程组。在一些研究中,自然病程组接受隐蔽的溶媒输注,溶媒是一种生理上无活性的物质,如盐溶液,以消除实验者对结果预期的差异。为了评估隐蔽以及公开输注溶媒是否能引发安慰剂反应,我们现在测试了一个不同的自然病程组,该组接受由可编程定时器控制的注射泵输注溶媒。对这两个对照组的比较提供了证据,表明隐蔽输注溶媒可引发安慰剂反应。使用这个新的对照组还能明确区分安慰剂镇痛中可被纳洛酮拮抗的成分与纳洛酮对手术应激诱导的内啡肽介导镇痛的拮抗作用。我们的研究强调了安慰剂的作用,并强调即使是最细微的线索也能引发安慰剂反应。