Suppr超能文献

[血糖自我监测:视觉读取还是自动读取?六种反应性试纸血糖测定方法的比较研究]

[Blood glucose self-monitoring: visual or automated read-out? Comparative study of 6 methods of blood glucose determination by reactive strips].

作者信息

Arlot S, Richard J L, Selam J L, Chaballier L, Mirouze J

出版信息

Ann Med Interne (Paris). 1984;135(7):551-6.

PMID:6517429
Abstract

Home blood glucose monitoring is becoming increasingly popular in diabetic patients. The purpose of this work was to determine the accuracy of this technique. We have compared plasma glucose obtained in the laboratory and two reagent strips (Dextrostix and Haemoglukotest 20-800). No differences were found among visually-read values and meter-read values using either Dextrometer, Glukometer, Hypocount or Glucochek. Thus, visually-read strips seem to be sufficient for clinical purposes with best results for HGT. The performances of different meters are similar. Nevertheless must patients favoured the use of a meter because of the apparent "objectivity" of the values. Furthermore, meters provide to patients a better involvement in the management of their disease.

摘要

家庭血糖监测在糖尿病患者中越来越普遍。这项工作的目的是确定该技术的准确性。我们比较了实验室检测所得的血浆葡萄糖水平与两种试纸(葡萄糖氧化酶试纸和血糖仪测试条20 - 800)。使用右旋血糖仪、血糖仪、Hypocount血糖仪或Glucochek血糖仪时,目测值和仪器读取值之间未发现差异。因此,目测试纸似乎足以满足临床需求,其中HGT试纸效果最佳。不同血糖仪的性能相似。然而,由于数值明显具有“客观性”,大多数患者更喜欢使用血糖仪。此外,血糖仪能让患者更好地参与自身疾病的管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验