Suppr超能文献

超过60000例闭合式麻醉的实践经验。闭合式麻醉概念的传统及未来意义。

Practical experience with more than 60,000 closed circuit anesthesias. Traditional and future implications of the closed circuit concept.

作者信息

Droh R, Rolly G, Schepp R

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1984;35(4):265-72.

PMID:6532070
Abstract

In a twelve year period, over 60,000 anesthesias were administered using a completely closed anesthesia system. Our results show that even in these days, when the cost of anesthetic gasses and vapours are small compared to the total cost of operative medical treatment, a substantial reduction in cost is still possible by using Closed Circuit Anesthesia (CCA). During normal anesthetic practice using semi open or semi closed anesthesia systems 70% to 95% of the anesthetic gases and vapours are wasted, though this medical contribution to the environmental pollution with halogenated hydrocarbons is small compared to industrial and domestic output, we have a firm ideological standpoint in this matter, and we believe that also from this point of view we should minimise our "anesthetic wastes" as much as possible. Probably the most important reason to use CCA however is the optimal conditioning of the inspired gasses, and the increased monitoring possibilities. New promising anesthesia machines are under development, which will be able to administer CCA in a completely automatic fashion, this in contrast to the classic manually controlled and ventilated CCA systems.

摘要

在12年的时间里,使用完全封闭的麻醉系统进行了超过60000次麻醉。我们的结果表明,即使在如今麻醉气体和蒸汽成本与手术医疗总成本相比微不足道的情况下,通过使用闭路麻醉(CCA)仍有可能大幅降低成本。在使用半开放或半封闭麻醉系统的正常麻醉操作过程中,70%至95%的麻醉气体和蒸汽被浪费,尽管与工业和家庭排放相比,这种医疗行为对卤代烃环境污染的贡献较小,但我们在这个问题上有坚定的思想立场,并且我们认为从这个角度来看,我们也应该尽可能减少我们的“麻醉废弃物”。然而,使用CCA最重要的原因可能是对吸入气体的优化调节以及增加的监测可能性。新的有前景的麻醉机正在研发中,它将能够以完全自动的方式进行CCA,这与传统的手动控制和通气的CCA系统形成对比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验