Kowler E, van der Steen J, Tamminga E P, Collewijn H
Vision Res. 1984;24(12):1789-98. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90010-5.
Prior work has shown that smooth eye movements in the presence of both stationary and moving stimuli are determined, at least in part, by the voluntary selection of either the stationary or the moving stimulus as the target for smooth eye movements. The effectiveness of voluntary selection in eliminating the influence of the stimuli not selected (i.e. backgrounds) on smooth eye movement is not known because prior studies used targets and backgrounds with different physical characteristics. Thus, effects of voluntary selection were confounded with the relative strength of target and background as stimuli for smooth eye movements. We measured eye movements (resolution 1') of two highly-experienced eye movement subjects with a target and background with the same physical characteristics: two, identical, full-field, superimposed patterns of randomly-positioned dots (1 dot/deg2 or 8 dots/deg2). One field was stationary and the other moved at 70.2 minarc/sec. The effect of the moving background on smooth eye movements when the stationary field was the target, and the effect of the stationary background on smooth eye movements when the moving field was the target was negligible (0-4% for one subject; 0-2% for the other). The influence of the background on smooth eye movements was affected by a six-fold reduction in the intensity of either the target or background, but effects of such intensity changes were small and different for each subject. Taken together, these results show that the effectiveness of voluntary selection in eliminating the influence of background stimuli on smooth eye movements can be virtually complete. Any observed influence of the background--however small--can be attributed to voluntary factors (e.g. subjects' failure to apply sufficient effort or attention) rather than to the operation of an involuntary mechanism that automatically integrates velocity information from target and background. The attention and effort required to ensure that voluntary selection is perfect may impair the accuracy of psychophysical judgments made about the background.
先前的研究表明,在存在静止和移动刺激的情况下,平稳眼动至少部分取决于对静止或移动刺激的自愿选择,以此作为平稳眼动的目标。由于先前的研究使用的目标和背景具有不同的物理特征,因此尚不清楚自愿选择在消除未被选择的刺激(即背景)对平稳眼动的影响方面的有效性。因此,自愿选择的效果与目标和背景作为平稳眼动刺激的相对强度混淆在一起。我们使用具有相同物理特征的目标和背景,测量了两名经验丰富的眼动受试者的眼动(分辨率1'):两个相同的全场随机定位点叠加图案(1个点/度²或8个点/度²)。一个场是静止的,另一个以70.2分弧度/秒的速度移动。当静止场作为目标时,移动背景对平稳眼动的影响,以及当移动场作为目标时,静止背景对平稳眼动的影响可以忽略不计(一名受试者为0 - 4%;另一名受试者为0 - 2%)。背景对平稳眼动的影响会受到目标或背景强度降低六倍的影响,但这种强度变化对每个受试者的影响都很小且不同。综合来看,这些结果表明,自愿选择在消除背景刺激对平稳眼动影响方面的有效性几乎可以达到完全。任何观察到的背景影响——无论多么小——都可归因于自愿因素(例如受试者未能付出足够的努力或注意力),而不是归因于自动整合来自目标和背景的速度信息的非自愿机制的运作。确保自愿选择完美所需的注意力和努力可能会损害对背景做出的心理物理学判断的准确性。