Mazzei T, Bonazza M, Amunni G, Scarselli G, Branconi F, Massi G B
Chemioterapia. 1984 Feb;3(1):10-5.
The authors compared both therapeutic efficacy and toxicity of two different treatment regimens: ABC = adriamycin, nitrogen mustard (BCNU) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) vs. AC = adriamycin and cyclophosphamide in ovarian cancer. Thirty-one patients were entered under treatment plan ABC and 26 under treatment plan AC simultaneously. Therapeutic evaluation was subdivided into different risk groups (adjuvant therapy, residual disease less than or greater than 2 cm). A similar result could be noted in the two different treatment regimens. Toxicity was more severe and frequent in the group treated with BCNU. The AC regimen was preferred because of its lower incidence of side-effects and for its easier mode of administration.
作者比较了两种不同治疗方案(ABC方案:阿霉素、氮芥(卡莫司汀)和环磷酰胺 对比 AC方案:阿霉素和环磷酰胺)在卵巢癌治疗中的疗效和毒性。31名患者同时进入ABC治疗方案,26名患者进入AC治疗方案。疗效评估分为不同风险组(辅助治疗、残留病灶小于或大于2厘米)。在两种不同治疗方案中可观察到相似的结果。使用卡莫司汀治疗的组毒性更严重且更频繁。AC方案因副作用发生率较低且给药方式更简便而更受青睐。