Cronenwett L R
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1984;20(5):167-203.
Most researchers have examined the effects of stress and social support on pregnancy outcomes without identifying the relationship between social support and social network factors. While the type and amount of support have been shown to be related to pregnancy outcomes, the sources of that support and the influence of network structure on a person's supportive resources have not been defined. Network factors, in fact, may predict perceived support or may explain more of the variance in pregnancy outcomes than social support does alone. The objectives of this study were to describe the social networks of primigravida women and their husbands; to determine if there are any differences in social networks based on gender, education, or income; and to examine the relationships among network characteristics, demographic characteristics, and perceived availability of support from network members. The 54 couples who composed the sample for this study were recruited through local physicians who provided the names of all clients who were primigravidas, living with the father of the child, and residing within 25 miles of Ann Arbor, Michigan. During the third trimester of pregnancy, couples were interviewed in their homes, and each parent completed a Social Network Inventory (SNI). The SNI obtained information about the size of the network, role relationships, frequency of contact, percent of uniplex relationships, and degree of overlap with spouse's social network. In addition, parents were provided with definitions of each of House's (1981) four types of social support and asked to indicate which forms of support they received from each network member. Both individual variables (age and educational level) and network structure variables (size, percent kin, percent females, frequency, and density) were significantly associated with the amount of perceived social support. For each type of support, the independent variables associated with support were different for men and women.
大多数研究人员在未明确社会支持与社会网络因素之间关系的情况下,研究了压力和社会支持对妊娠结局的影响。虽然已表明支持的类型和数量与妊娠结局相关,但这种支持的来源以及网络结构对个人支持资源的影响尚未明确。事实上,网络因素可能预测感知到的支持,或者比单独的社会支持能解释更多妊娠结局的差异。本研究的目的是描述初产妇及其丈夫的社会网络;确定基于性别、教育程度或收入的社会网络是否存在差异;并研究网络特征、人口统计学特征以及网络成员感知到的支持可用性之间的关系。本研究的样本由54对夫妇组成,他们是通过当地医生招募的,这些医生提供了所有初产妇、与孩子父亲同住且居住在密歇根州安娜堡25英里范围内的客户的姓名。在妊娠晚期,夫妇们在家中接受访谈,每位家长都完成了一份社会网络问卷(SNI)。SNI获取了有关网络规模、角色关系、接触频率、单向关系百分比以及与配偶社会网络的重叠程度的信息。此外,向家长们提供了豪斯(1981)提出的四种社会支持类型的定义,并要求他们指出从每个网络成员那里获得了哪些形式的支持。个体变量(年龄和教育水平)和网络结构变量(规模、亲属百分比、女性百分比、频率和密度)都与感知到的社会支持量显著相关。对于每种支持类型,与支持相关的自变量在男性和女性中有所不同。