Wolpaw J R, Noonan P A, O'Keefe J A
Brain Res. 1984 May 23;300(2):385-91. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90852-7.
Recent studies have revealed two phenomena producing considerable variation in amplitude of the initial, purely segmental, largely monosynaptic, response to sudden muscle stretch, the spinal stretch reflex (SSR), without change in background EMG activity or initial muscle length. The first is small and short-term, a modest diurnal rhythm in SSR amplitude. The second is large and long-term, marked adaptive change in SSR amplitude which occurs gradually over weeks and months when animals are rewarded for such change. This second phenomenon may involve persistent segmental alteration, and, if so, could constitute a technically accessible substrate of memory. The present study compared the two phenomena and sought evidence of interaction between them. The diurnal rhythm persisted, without change in phase and with only minimal change in amplitude, despite the occurrence of marked adaptive change. Animals did not utilize the rhythm to increase reward percentage by altering daily performance schedules. These results suggest that the mechanisms of the diurnal rhythm and of adaptive plasticity in SSR amplitude are separate and independent. The diurnal rhythm's effect on movement was not altered by adaptive change in SSR amplitude. This effect was comparable to adaptive change's effect on movement when both were expressed as change in movement/change in SSR amplitude.
最近的研究揭示了两种现象,它们在对突然的肌肉拉伸(脊髓牵张反射,SSR)的初始纯节段性、主要是单突触反应的幅度上产生了相当大的变化,而背景肌电图活动或初始肌肉长度没有改变。第一种现象规模小且持续时间短,是SSR幅度中适度的昼夜节律。第二种现象规模大且持续时间长,是SSR幅度的显著适应性变化,当动物因这种变化而得到奖励时,这种变化会在数周和数月内逐渐发生。第二种现象可能涉及持续性的节段性改变,如果是这样,可能构成一种在技术上可触及的记忆底物。本研究比较了这两种现象,并寻找它们之间相互作用的证据。尽管发生了显著的适应性变化,但昼夜节律仍然存在,相位没有变化,幅度仅有微小变化。动物并没有通过改变日常表现时间表来利用这种节律提高奖励百分比。这些结果表明,昼夜节律机制和SSR幅度适应性可塑性机制是分开且独立的。SSR幅度的适应性变化并没有改变昼夜节律对运动的影响。当两者都表示为运动变化/SSR幅度变化时,这种影响与适应性变化对运动的影响相当。