Sampson H A, Albergo R
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984 Jul;74(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(84)90083-6.
Forty children with atopic dermatitis were evaluated for clinical evidence of hypersensitivity to foods by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. Twenty-four children (60%) experienced 33 positive challenges, manifested by cutaneous symptoms in 31 (94%), gastrointestinal symptoms in 14 (42%), nasal symptoms in nine (27%), and respiratory in six (18%). Results of prick skin tests (STs) and RASTs to eight food antigens frequently eliciting hypersensitivity reactions were compared with those from food challenges to determine the diagnostic accuracy in children with atopic dermatitis. Defining a positive ST as a wheal 3 mm larger than the negative control wheal and a positive RAST as a Phadebas RAST score of 3 or 4, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive accuracies of these tests were found to be comparable except in the case of wheat antigen where the ST was clearly superior to the RAST. Accepting a RAST score of 2 or more as a positive slightly improved sensitivity in some cases but dramatically decreased specificity. Combining results of STs and RASTs did not improve significantly the diagnostic accuracy over results of the tests used individually. These studies demonstrate no advantage of RAST alone or in combination with prick skin testing over prick skin testing alone in the evaluation of food hypersensitivity in children with atopic dermatitis. Furthermore, skin testing should be considered a good test for excluding immediate food hypersensitivity but only a suggestive positive indicator of hypersensitivity due to the high rate of clinically insignificant positive STs.
通过双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验,对40名特应性皮炎患儿进行食物过敏的临床证据评估。24名儿童(60%)出现33次阳性激发反应,其中31次(94%)表现为皮肤症状,14次(42%)为胃肠道症状,9次(27%)为鼻部症状,6次(18%)为呼吸道症状。将对8种常引起过敏反应的食物抗原的点刺皮肤试验(STs)和放射变应原吸附试验(RASTs)结果与食物激发试验结果进行比较,以确定特应性皮炎患儿的诊断准确性。将阳性ST定义为风团比阴性对照风团大3mm,阳性RAST定义为Phadebas RAST评分为3或4,发现这些试验的敏感性、特异性和预测准确性具有可比性,但小麦抗原的情况除外,此时ST明显优于RAST。在某些情况下,将RAST评分2或更高作为阳性可略微提高敏感性,但会显著降低特异性。联合STs和RASTs结果相比单独使用这些试验的结果,诊断准确性并未显著提高。这些研究表明,在评估特应性皮炎患儿的食物过敏时,单独使用RAST或与点刺皮肤试验联合使用并不比单独使用点刺皮肤试验更具优势。此外,皮肤试验应被视为排除速发型食物过敏反应的良好试验,但由于临床上无意义的阳性STs发生率较高,它仅是过敏的一个提示性阳性指标。