Marcy S A, Brown J S, Danielson R
Res Nurs Health. 1983 Dec;6(4):175-82. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770060405.
Contraceptive behavior of adolescent females was examined in relation to their level of knowledge, and time and method of contraceptive counseling. Subjects were 122 subscribers to a prepaid health plan, 13-18 years of age, unmarried, sexually active, and not desiring pregnancy. Contraceptive counseling was offered to 62 adolescents following receipt of a negative pregnancy test and to 60 adolescents following a routine medical visit. The 80 adolescents who chose to participate in the study were randomly assigned to a conventional or developmental method of counseling. The effectiveness of their contraceptive practice was measured 1 year later. Two hypotheses were not upheld: Sexually active adolescents were not more likely to accept contraceptive counseling at the time of a negative pregnancy test than at a time of a routine medical visit, and did not subsequently become more effective users of contraceptives. Two hypotheses were upheld: Effective and ineffective users of contraception did not differ in level of knowledge, and adolescents counseled by a developmental method practiced contraception more effectively than those counseled by a conventional method. Findings are discussed in terms of the theory of adolescent development and the proposition that a pregnancy scare motivates teenagers to control fertility.
研究了青春期女性的避孕行为与其知识水平、避孕咨询的时间和方式之间的关系。研究对象为122名参加预付费健康计划的人员,年龄在13至18岁之间,未婚,有性行为,且不想要怀孕。在62名青少年妊娠试验呈阴性后以及60名青少年进行常规医疗就诊后,为他们提供了避孕咨询。选择参与研究的80名青少年被随机分配到传统咨询方法组或发展性咨询方法组。1年后测量了他们避孕措施的有效性。有两个假设未得到支持:有性行为的青少年在妊娠试验呈阴性时接受避孕咨询的可能性并不比在常规医疗就诊时更高,且随后也没有成为更有效的避孕使用者。有两个假设得到了支持:有效的避孕使用者和无效的避孕使用者在知识水平上没有差异,并且接受发展性咨询方法的青少年比接受传统咨询方法的青少年在避孕方面做得更有效。根据青少年发展理论以及怀孕恐慌促使青少年控制生育的观点对研究结果进行了讨论。