Kochhar D S, Fraser T M
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1978 May;49(5):698-706.
The performance of static visual identification tasks and simulated operational flying tasks, by nine binocular pilots and nine adapted monocular pilots, was measured in a unique operational visual simulator. It was hypothesized that, with head free to move, and adapted monocular pilot would perform as well as a binocular pilot, while an unadapted monocular (simulated by covering an eye) would perform less well. Other hypotheses were advanced. The static primary central task required sequential identification of dial readings. The dynamic primary central task involved simulated aircraft landing operations. During each set of primary tasks, a set of secondary peripheral visual tasks was performed. Results of the primary tasks and times of execution of the secondary tasks were subjected to analysis of variance. Factors included head position (fixed or free), stimulus location in peripheral field, eye state (seeing eye, blind eye), and type of central task (static, dynamic). All hypotheses were validated.
在一个独特的操作视觉模拟器中，对9名双眼飞行员和9名适应性单眼飞行员进行了静态视觉识别任务和模拟操作飞行任务的测试。假设在头部可自由移动的情况下，适应性单眼飞行员的表现将与双眼飞行员一样好，而未适应的单眼飞行员（通过遮住一只眼睛模拟）表现会较差。还提出了其他假设。静态主要中心任务要求按顺序识别刻度盘读数。动态主要中心任务涉及模拟飞机着陆操作。在每组主要任务期间，还执行了一组次要周边视觉任务。对主要任务的结果和次要任务的执行时间进行了方差分析。因素包括头部位置（固定或自由）、周边视野中的刺激位置、眼睛状态（视物眼、盲眼）以及中心任务类型（静态、动态）。所有假设均得到验证。
