• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定性研究的解读与报告

Interpreting and reporting qualitative research.

作者信息

Knafl K A, Howard M J

出版信息

Res Nurs Health. 1984 Mar;7(1):17-24. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770070105.

DOI:10.1002/nur.4770070105
PMID:6565296
Abstract

The aims of this paper were to clarify the nature and purpose of qualitative research and to suggest specific guidelines for reporting the results of qualitative studies. Confusion about the purpose of qualitative research and the absence of a standardized format for reporting such research make it difficult to assess the validity of qualitative studies. Four general purposes of qualitative research were discussed: instrument development, illustration of results, description, and conceptualization. A framework for reporting qualitative research that provides a guide for assuring consistency across original study purpose, study design, and final report was presented and can be used for either evaluating or writing a report of qualitative research.

摘要

本文的目的是阐明定性研究的性质和目的,并提出报告定性研究结果的具体指南。对定性研究目的的困惑以及缺乏报告此类研究的标准化格式,使得难以评估定性研究的有效性。讨论了定性研究的四个一般目的:工具开发、结果阐释、描述和概念化。提出了一个报告定性研究的框架,该框架为确保原始研究目的、研究设计和最终报告之间的一致性提供了指导,可用于评估或撰写定性研究报告。

相似文献

1
Interpreting and reporting qualitative research.定性研究的解读与报告
Res Nurs Health. 1984 Mar;7(1):17-24. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770070105.
2
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
3
The qualitative research proposal.定性研究计划书。
Curationis. 2008 Dec;31(4):62-72. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v31i4.1062.
4
Qualitative concept development: implications for nursing research and knowledge.质性概念发展:对护理研究与知识的影响
Nurs Forum. 2006 Jul-Sep;41(3):103-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2006.00045.x.
5
Triangulation of communication skills in qualitative research instruments.定性研究工具中沟通技巧的三角互证法
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Oct;24(4):688-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.02446.x.
6
Concept analysis: some limitations and possible solutions.概念分析:一些局限性及可能的解决方案。
Curationis. 2002 Aug;25(3):23-7. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v25i3.779.
7
A Guide to Writing a Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol to Enhance Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Health Care.撰写定性系统评价方案指南,以加强护理和医疗保健中的循证实践
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Jun;13(3):241-9. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12134. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
8
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
9
IMPAD-22: a checklist for authors of qualitative nursing research manuscripts.IMPAD - 22:质性护理研究手稿作者核对清单
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1295-300. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.03.010. Epub 2013 Apr 21.
10
Concept analysis in nursing research: a critical appraisal.护理研究中的概念分析:批判性评价。
Sch Inq Nurs Pract. 1996 Fall;10(3):253-77.

引用本文的文献

1
Core Values in the Traditional Provision of Hearing Health Care.传统听力保健服务中的核心价值观。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Feb 13;66(2):750-764. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00540. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
2
A Review of Strategies for Enhancing Clarity and Reader Accessibility of Qualitative Research Results.增强定性研究结果清晰度和读者可理解性的策略综述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7124. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7124.
3
At the cross-roads of participatory research and biomarker discovery in autism: the need for empirical data.
在自闭症参与式研究与生物标志物发现的交叉点:对实证数据的需求。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Dec 15;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0082-0.
4
Impact of Noncaregiving-Related Stressors on Informal Caregiver Outcomes.与非照料相关压力源对非正式照料者结局的影响。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2014 Aug;29(5):426-32. doi: 10.1177/1533317513518652. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
5
Understanding the breast cancer experience of women: a qualitative study of African American, Asian American, Latina and Caucasian cancer survivors.了解女性的乳腺癌经历:对非裔美国、亚裔美国、拉丁裔和白人癌症幸存者的定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2004 Jun;13(6):408-28. doi: 10.1002/pon.750.
6
Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies.定性研究的批判性评价清单
Indian J Pediatr. 2000 May;67(5):347-51. doi: 10.1007/BF02820685.