Gettinger G, Patters M R, Testa M A, Löe H, Anerud A, Boysen H, Robertson P B
J Periodontol. 1983 Mar;54(3):155-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1983.54.3.155.
Selected teeth have been used to represent the entire dentition in many epidemiological and clinical investigations. The present study sought to assess the relationship between the six selected teeth described by Ramfjord and the entire dentition for the Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Calculus Index and Loss of Attachment. The computations were performed on measurements obtained in investigations of the natural history of periodontal disease in Norway and Sri Lanka. A consistently strong correlation was observed between the tooth subset and whole mouth for all indices in both populations. This relationship persisted even though single members or pairs of the subset of teeth were removed from the calculations. Some bias, however, was observed with all indices. Plaque and gingival indices obtained from the six teeth underestimated whole mouth scores in the low range (less than 1.0) and overestimated scores in the high range (greater than 2.0). Use of the tooth subset for calculus and loss of attachment consistently overestimated scores for the entire dentition.
在许多流行病学和临床研究中,已选用特定牙齿来代表整个牙列。本研究旨在评估Ramfjord所描述的六颗选定牙齿与整个牙列在菌斑指数、牙龈指数、牙石指数和附着丧失方面的关系。计算是基于在挪威和斯里兰卡进行的牙周病自然史调查中获得的测量数据。在这两个人群中,所有指数的牙齿子集与全口之间均观察到持续强烈的相关性。即使从计算中移除子集的单个成员或成对牙齿,这种关系仍然存在。然而,所有指数都观察到了一些偏差。从六颗牙齿获得的菌斑和牙龈指数在低范围(小于1.0)低估了全口得分,而在高范围(大于2.0)高估了得分。使用牙齿子集计算牙石和附着丧失时,始终高估了整个牙列的得分。