Glennon R A, Young R, Jacyno J M
Biochem Pharmacol. 1983 Apr 1;32(7):1267-73. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(83)90281-2.
Animals (rats), trained to discriminate the hallucinogenic agent 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) from saline in a two-lever operant procedure, were challenged with various doses of several indolealkylamine and phenalkylamine derivatives. In both series, the alpha-methyl analogs were found to be more active than either their N-methyl or alpha-demethyl counterparts. Furthermore, when the activities of the optical isomers of DOM were compared with the activities of S-(+) and R-(-)-alpha-methyltryptamine (alpha-MeT), it was found that the more potent isomer of alpha-MeT (i.e. S) possessed the opposite absolute configuration of the more potent isomer of DOM (i.e. R). With respect to the mechanism of action of these agents, these findings are not inconsistent with a common site hypothesis.
通过双杠杆操作程序训练大鼠区分致幻剂1-(2,5-二甲氧基-4-甲基苯基)-2-氨基丙烷(DOM)和生理盐水,然后用几种吲哚烷基胺和苯烷基胺衍生物的不同剂量对其进行挑战。在这两个系列中,发现α-甲基类似物比其N-甲基或α-去甲基对应物更具活性。此外,当将DOM的旋光异构体的活性与S-(+)和R-(-)-α-甲基色胺(α-MeT)的活性进行比较时,发现α-MeT中更有效的异构体(即S)具有与DOM中更有效的异构体(即R)相反的绝对构型。关于这些药物的作用机制,这些发现与共同位点假说并不矛盾。