Kawahara H
Int Dent J. 1983 Dec;33(4):350-75.
Adhesion of bone and epithelial cells to the dental implant are vital to its retention in alveolar bone and to the prevention of infection via its 'gingival' margin. Studies of cytotoxicity, tissue irritability and carcinogenicity of implantable polymers, metals and ceramics and of tissue adhesion to them have been carried out in tissue culture and in animal experiments. The more similar the polymeric materials are chemically to living tissue the more easily are they dissolved and digested in the host. Therefore, implant materials having a molecular structure similar to protein or polysaccharide, e.g. Nylon, cannot be expected to function. On the other hand, silicones, polyethylene and Teflon (polytetrafluroethylene), which have molecular structures completely different from living substances, are generally more stable in the tissues. However, these polymers are hydrophobic and have little adhesion to living cells in spite of their high stability. They are not, therefore, suitable materials for the construction of implants. Studies on antithrombotic polymers have demonstrated the possibility of creating implantable polymers which have high stability as well as strong adhesion to the surrounding tissues. These properties may be conferred by grafting a hydrophilic polymer on to the surface of a hydrophobic polymer. Of the metals, Ti, Zr and Ta are fairly stable in living tissue, and allow cells to adhere strongly. Alloys of Co-Cr-Mo, Fe-Ni-Cr-Mo, Ti-Al-V, Ti-Mo, Ti-Pd and Ti-Pt deserve to be better evaluated because they are low in density, have high mechanical strength, stability and corrosion resistance in living tissue, and there is direct adhesion to the surrounding tissues. Biodegradable or bioactive ceramics which induce bone formation around the implant do not have sufficient mechanical strength. Implant ceramics have to be stable, e.g. crystal alumina, vitreous carbon, synthetic hydroxypatite and silicon nitrate. These exhibit high biocompatibility and excellent adhesion to tissue. Single crystal sapphire ceramics with high mechanical strength permit the delicate designs required for implants. Success with dental implants may depend upon combining the rigid retention of porous stable alloys or ceramics of suitable Young's modulus with a stress absorbing superstructure. A further development to be expected is the appearance of composite and polyphase materials which have tissue adhesiveness, stability in living tissues and various degrees of Young's modulus.
骨细胞和上皮细胞与牙种植体的黏附对于种植体在牙槽骨中的固位以及通过其“牙龈”边缘预防感染至关重要。在组织培养和动物实验中,已对可植入聚合物、金属和陶瓷的细胞毒性、组织刺激性和致癌性以及组织与它们的黏附性进行了研究。聚合物材料在化学上与活组织越相似,它们在宿主体内就越容易溶解和被消化。因此,具有类似于蛋白质或多糖分子结构的植入材料,例如尼龙,无法发挥作用。另一方面,具有与生物物质完全不同分子结构的硅酮、聚乙烯和特氟龙(聚四氟乙烯)在组织中通常更稳定。然而,这些聚合物具有疏水性,尽管稳定性高,但与活细胞的黏附性很小。因此,它们不是用于构建植入物的合适材料。对抗血栓聚合物的研究表明,有可能制造出既具有高稳定性又能与周围组织强力黏附的可植入聚合物。这些特性可以通过将亲水性聚合物接枝到疏水性聚合物表面来赋予。在金属中,钛、锆和钽在活组织中相当稳定,并能使细胞强烈黏附。钴 - 铬 - 钼、铁 - 镍 - 铬 - 钼、钛 - 铝 - 钒、钛 - 钼、钛 - 钯和钛 - 铂合金值得进一步评估,因为它们密度低,在活组织中具有高机械强度、稳定性和耐腐蚀性,并且与周围组织有直接黏附。可诱导种植体周围骨形成的可生物降解或生物活性陶瓷的机械强度不足。植入陶瓷必须稳定,例如晶体氧化铝、玻璃碳、合成羟基磷灰石和硝酸硅。这些材料表现出高生物相容性和对组织的优异黏附性。具有高机械强度的单晶蓝宝石陶瓷允许进行植入物所需的精细设计。牙种植体的成功可能取决于将具有合适杨氏模量的多孔稳定合金或陶瓷的刚性固位与应力吸收上部结构相结合。预期的进一步发展是出现具有组织黏附性、在活组织中稳定性以及不同程度杨氏模量的复合材料和多相材料。