Osterhaus E, Birkner P
Z Rechtsmed. 1984;91(3):231-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02116426.
This statistical analysis of the results of 288 paternity cases is a contribution to the discussion of those blood group systems to be selected for the basis of paternity expertise in the Federal Republic of Germany. When typing 22 blood-group systems in 288 one-man cases, we found exclusions in 101 (35.07%) of them. In only 83 (44.39%) of the 187 cases with nonexclusions did the resulting EM value correspond to the verbal predicate: "paternity practically proved." The results of the systems of factors Kell(K1), Tf(C,B,D), AK and 6-PGD had the smallest rate of exclusion constellations and only inferior influence on the resulting EM values. Replacing them by isoelectric focusing of the systems PGM1, Tf, Gc, Pi and PLG (plasminogen) seems to be reasonable. The factors P1 and Km(1) proved more favorable for the results of paternity cases.
对288例亲子鉴定案例结果进行的这项统计分析，有助于讨论在德意志联邦共和国进行亲子鉴定专业鉴定时应选用哪些血型系统。在对288例单人案例进行22种血型系统分型时，我们发现其中101例（35.07%）存在排除情况。在187例无排除情况的案例中，只有83例（44.39%）所得的EM值符合“亲子关系基本得到证明”这一文字表述。凯尔（K1）、运铁蛋白（C、B、D）、AK和6 - 磷酸葡萄糖脱氢酶等因子系统的排除组合率最低，对所得EM值的影响也较小。用PGM1、运铁蛋白、维生素D结合蛋白、蛋白酶抑制因子和纤溶酶原系统的等电聚焦法替代它们似乎是合理的。P1和Km(1)因子对亲子鉴定案例结果更为有利。
