Colin W, Donoff R B
J Dent Res. 1984 Jul;63(7):987-93. doi: 10.1177/00220345840630071601.
Severe nerve injuries may require microsurgical grafting to span a defect. Introduction of graft material into a highly vascular recipient bed is documented to aid in early regeneration of neuronal blood supply. A silicone rod (SR)-induced fibrovascular sheath was employed to evaluate the regeneration of rat tibial nerve through 2-mm-diameter collagen tubes (CT) or contralateral nerve autografts (AUTO). At first operation, 5 mm of right tibial nerve was resected from 30 retired male breeder Sprague-Dawley rats. Resected nerve was replaced with either a 5 X 2 mm SR or the nerve ends were sutured to the intermuscular fascia. Four weeks later, animals were repaired by replacing the SR with either a CT or a contralateral AUTO from the left tibial nerve. Three months later, EMG testing was performed, and histologic sections were prepared. The EMG latency and the size of the compound action potential for sheathed or non-sheathed CT or AUTO were statistically superior to controls at the 95% confidence level. All other intergroup comparisons of latency and action potential size were statistically insignificant. The proportion of nerve fibers traversing the surgical sites was not influenced by the method of repair or by the presence or absence of sheathing. Tubulized repairs most closely resembled unoperated nerves, and autografted repairs had a large diameter, but much fibrosis, whereas controls displayed immaturity and disorganization. Our observations suggest that there was no difference between repairs performed with or without a vascular pseudosheath. However, CT supported regeneration better than did AUTO repair.
严重的神经损伤可能需要显微外科移植来跨越缺损。有文献记载,将移植材料引入血管丰富的受区有助于神经元血液供应的早期再生。采用硅胶棒(SR)诱导的纤维血管鞘,通过直径2毫米的胶原管(CT)或对侧神经自体移植(AUTO)来评估大鼠胫神经的再生情况。在首次手术时,从30只退役的雄性繁殖斯普拉格-道利大鼠身上切除5毫米的右侧胫神经。切除的神经用5×2毫米的SR替代,或者将神经断端缝合到肌间筋膜上。四周后,通过用来自左侧胫神经的CT或对侧AUTO替换SR来修复动物。三个月后,进行肌电图测试,并制备组织学切片。在95%置信水平下,带鞘或不带鞘的CT或AUTO的肌电图潜伏期和复合动作电位大小在统计学上优于对照组。潜伏期和动作电位大小的所有其他组间比较在统计学上均无显著差异。穿过手术部位的神经纤维比例不受修复方法或是否有鞘的影响。管状修复最接近未手术的神经,自体移植修复直径大,但纤维化严重,而对照组则表现出不成熟和紊乱。我们的观察结果表明,有或没有血管假鞘进行的修复之间没有差异。然而,CT比自体移植修复更能支持神经再生。