Warshel A, Russell S T, Churg A K
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Aug;81(15):4785-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.15.4785.
The validity of macroscopic models for calculations of electrostatic energies in proteins is examined. The Tanford-Kirkwood (TK) model is extended to include the self energy of the ionized groups. It is shown that ionized groups cannot exist inside nonpolar regions of proteins and argued that the experimental finding of ions inside proteins proves that the corresponding local environment is polar. The modified TK model (MTK model), which adjusts charge-charge interactions by the corresponding solvent accessibilities, is found to be inconsistent with the TK model, on which it is based. The MTK model corresponds to a polar interior whereas the TK model assumes a nonpolar interior. It is shown that models that assume a high dielectric constant for proteins give reasonable results for interactions between charged groups at equilibrium. It is then explained why, in contradiction to common belief, protein interiors are polar around charged groups. It is argued that in focusing on charge-charge interactions one overlooks the key contribution of the protein dipoles in determining the self energy of charges in the interior of proteins.
本文考察了用于计算蛋白质静电能的宏观模型的有效性。将坦福德-柯克伍德(TK)模型进行扩展,使其包含电离基团的自能。结果表明,电离基团无法存在于蛋白质的非极性区域内,并且认为蛋白质内部存在离子这一实验发现证明了相应的局部环境是极性的。经发现,通过相应溶剂可及性来调整电荷-电荷相互作用的修正TK模型(MTK模型)与其所基于的TK模型不一致。MTK模型对应极性内部,而TK模型假定为非极性内部。结果表明,假设蛋白质具有高介电常数的模型对于平衡状态下带电基团之间的相互作用能给出合理结果。随后解释了为何与普遍看法相反,蛋白质内部在带电基团周围是极性的。有人认为,在关注电荷-电荷相互作用时,人们忽略了蛋白质偶极子在确定蛋白质内部电荷自能方面的关键贡献。