Suppr超能文献

参加冠心病危险因素筛查项目的受试者有多大的“代表性”?

How "representative" are subjects attending a coronary risk factor screening programme?

作者信息

Simons L A, Simons J

出版信息

Aust N Z J Med. 1984 Feb;14(1):35-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1984.tb03582.x.

Abstract

Coronary risk factors were compared in two groups of subjects aged 25-64 years. One group voluntarily, and at no cost, attended a risk factor screening clinic (n = 3844), while the second group represented a population sample drawn from the metropolitan Sydney electoral roll (n = 1394). Older subjects were over-represented in the screening clinic compared with the electoral roll sample. Hypercholesterolemia was more prevalent in the screening clinic in older females, while hypertension and current cigarette smoking were less prevalent in the screening clinic in older subjects of both sexes. Obesity was less prevalent in the screening clinic in older males. A voluntary screening programme may generate a unique and possibly unreproducible population sample.

摘要

对两组年龄在25至64岁的受试者的冠心病风险因素进行了比较。一组受试者自愿且免费参加了风险因素筛查门诊(n = 3844),而另一组是从悉尼大都市选民名册中抽取的人群样本(n = 1394)。与选民名册样本相比,筛查门诊中年龄较大的受试者占比过高。高胆固醇血症在老年女性的筛查门诊中更为普遍,而高血压和当前吸烟在两组老年受试者的筛查门诊中则不太普遍。肥胖在老年男性的筛查门诊中不太普遍。自愿筛查项目可能会产生一个独特且可能无法重现的人群样本。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验