Pancherz H
Am J Orthod. 1984 Feb;85(2):125-34. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90004-6.
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate cephalometrically the mechanism of anteroposterior occlusal changes in activator treatment. The analysis used made it possible to relate alterations in the occlusion to sagittal skeletal and dental changes in the maxilla and mandible. The sample consisted of thirty Class II, Division 1 malocclusion cases treated successfully with activators during an average time period of 32 months. Before- and after-treatment head films in centric occlusion were analyzed. The occlusal line (OL) and occlusal line perpendicular (OLp) through sella were used for reference. Linear measurements were performed parallel to OL. The following results were found: (1) The improvement in occlusal relationships in the molar and incisor segments was about equally a result of skeletal and dental changes. (2) Overjet correction averaging 5.0 mm was a result of 2.4 mm more mandibular growth than maxillary growth, a 2.5 mm distal movement of the maxillary incisors, and a 0.1 mm mesial movement of the mandibular incisors. (3) Class II molar correction averaging 5.1 mm was a result of 2.4 mm more mandibular growth than maxillary growth, a 0.4 mm distal movement of the maxillary molars, and a 2.3 mm mesial movement of the mandibular molars. (4) When the findings were compared with longitudinal records of persons with normal occlusion (Bolton standards), activator treatment seemed to inhibit maxillary growth, move the maxillary incisors and molars distally, and move the mandibular incisors and molars mesially. Mandibular growth appeared not to be affected by activator treatment.
本研究的目的是通过头影测量法评估功能矫治器治疗中前后向咬合变化的机制。所采用的分析方法能够将咬合变化与上颌骨和下颌骨的矢状骨骼及牙齿变化联系起来。样本包括30例安氏II类1分类错牙合病例,平均使用功能矫治器治疗32个月,治疗均获成功。分析了正中咬合位的治疗前后头颅侧位片。以通过蝶鞍的咬合线(OL)和咬合垂线(OLp)作为参照。沿OL进行线性测量。结果如下:(1)磨牙段和切牙段咬合关系的改善约同等程度地源于骨骼和牙齿的变化。(2)平均5.0mm的覆盖减小是由于下颌生长比上颌多2.4mm、上颌切牙远中移动2.5mm以及下颌切牙近中移动0.1mm所致。(3)平均5.1mm的II类磨牙关系改善是由于下颌生长比上颌多2.4mm、上颌磨牙远中移动0.4mm以及下颌磨牙近中移动2.3mm所致。(4)当将这些结果与正常咬合者的纵向记录(博尔顿标准)相比较时,功能矫治器治疗似乎抑制了上颌生长,使上颌切牙和磨牙远中移动,并使下颌切牙和磨牙近中移动。下颌生长似乎未受功能矫治器治疗的影响。