Nerviano V J, Weitzel W D
J Clin Psychol. 1977 Apr;33(2):400-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197704)33:2<400::aid-jclp2270330214>3.0.co;2-v.
This study assessed the cross-inventory generalizability of personality characterizations for Cattell's 16 PF and Gough's CPI. The univariate and multivariate relationships of these scales to their measures of impression management and general aptitude also were explored. Although many PF and CPI content scales and highly similar descriptions, all were found to have poor and inconsistent cross-inventory convergences. The 16 PF and CPI correlates of the desirability scales were found to be similar and consistent with prior research, although the number and magnitude of those for some CPI scales seemed somewhat inappropriate (as were some between the CPI and general aptitude). The relationships of the desirability scales to the content scales of each inventory were found to be heavily dependent upon rotation after factor analysis. It was concluded that the high degree of scale dissimilarity between the 16 PF and CPI must caution against clinical and research generalization across these two inventories. In addition, further investigation of these current impression management scales seems worth pursuing because they appeared to represent the most consistent characteristics measured.
本研究评估了卡特尔16种人格因素问卷（16 PF）和高夫人格问卷（CPI）中人格特征的跨量表通用性。还探讨了这些量表与印象管理和一般能力测量之间的单变量和多变量关系。尽管许多PF和CPI内容量表及描述高度相似，但所有量表的跨量表收敛性均较差且不一致。期望量表的16 PF和CPI相关因素与先前研究相似且一致，不过某些CPI量表的相关因素数量和程度似乎有些不合适（CPI与一般能力之间的某些相关因素也是如此）。发现期望量表与每个量表内容量表之间的关系在很大程度上取决于因子分析后的旋转。得出的结论是，16 PF和CPI之间量表的高度差异必须警示在这两个量表之间进行临床和研究推断时需谨慎。此外，对当前这些印象管理量表进行进一步研究似乎值得，因为它们似乎代表了所测量的最一致的特征。
