Nelson W M, Edinger J D, Wallace J
J Pers Assess. 1978 Jun;42(3):302-11. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4203_13.
Previous research has suggested that the Pauker (1963) and Satz and Mogul (1962) short forms of the WAIS have been efficacious in estimating the standard form. While there is a growing need in correctional settings for quicker evaluation procedures, the lack of WAIS short form research with prisoners prohibits their use with such populations. Hence, this study employed 126 young adult male inmates to test the comparability of the above cited short forms and the standard WAIS across a variety of evaluative criteria. The results generally suggested the superiority of the Pauker (1963) form in estimating the standard WAIS. However, because the current study employed only black and white young male offenders it is suggested that the current findings not be generalized to other age groups, races, or women inmates until these findings are cross-validated on such samples.
先前的研究表明，韦氏成人智力量表（WAIS）的帕克（1963年）简式和萨茨与莫古尔（1962年）简式在估计标准版方面是有效的。虽然教养机构对更快评估程序的需求日益增长，但针对囚犯的韦氏成人智力量表简式研究的缺乏阻碍了其在此类人群中的使用。因此，本研究招募了126名成年男性青年囚犯，以测试上述简式与韦氏成人智力量表标准版在各种评估标准上的可比性。结果总体上表明帕克（1963年）简式在估计韦氏成人智力量表标准版方面具有优势。然而，由于当前研究仅采用了黑人和白人青年男性罪犯，建议在这些结果在其他样本上进行交叉验证之前，不要将当前的研究结果推广到其他年龄组、种族或女性囚犯。
