Lowy F D, Chang D S, Aning V, Williams S, Szilagyi G
J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Nov;18(5):1122-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.5.1122-1126.1983.
The reliabilities of five in vitro susceptibility tests (agar dilution, broth microdilution, automated MS-2, Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion, and ability to grow on methicillin-containing agar) to predict the susceptibility of 204 coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates to penicillinase-resistant semisynthetic penicillins were compared. There was wide variation in susceptibility, with results ranging from 86.3% susceptible by MS-2 to 38.2% by growth on methicillin-containing agar. The results of the broth dilution techniques, including the MS-2, were significantly different (P less than 0.02) from the remaining tests. Nafcillin disks were less effective (P less than 0.02) than oxacillin disks in predicting resistance. Kirby-Bauer oxacillin disks and the ability to grow on methicillin-containing agar were the most reliable predictors of resistance. The MS-2 did not reliably predict resistance.
比较了五种体外药敏试验(琼脂稀释法、肉汤微量稀释法、自动化MS-2法、 Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法以及在含甲氧西林琼脂上生长的能力)预测204株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌分离株对耐青霉素酶半合成青霉素敏感性的可靠性。敏感性存在很大差异,结果从MS-2法检测出的86.3%敏感到在含甲氧西林琼脂上生长法检测出的38.2%敏感不等。包括MS-2法在内的肉汤稀释技术的结果与其余试验结果有显著差异(P小于0.02)。在预测耐药性方面,萘夫西林纸片的效果(P小于0.02)不如苯唑西林纸片。Kirby-Bauer苯唑西林纸片法以及在含甲氧西林琼脂上生长的能力是最可靠的耐药性预测指标。MS-2法不能可靠地预测耐药性。