Suppr超能文献

CT与血管造影术在评估胰腺癌可切除性方面的比较。

Comparison of CT and angiography in assessing resectability of pancreatic carcinoma.

作者信息

Jafri S Z, Aisen A M, Glazer G M, Weiss C A

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Mar;142(3):525-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.142.3.525.

Abstract

A retrospective study of 27 patients with pancreatic carcinoma compared computed tomography (CT) and angiography in their ability to predict resectability of the neoplasm, using encasement of the splanchnic vessels as the criterion for nonresectability. Five patients had resectable tumor at surgery; the other 22 had unresectable disease. Tumor involvement of the splanchnic vessels was determined in 18 patients by CT examination and in 19 patients by angiography. Several other patients were found to have liver metastases, resulting in a radiologic diagnosis of nonresectability in 20 patients overall. All patients considered to have unresectable disease on the basis of either radiologic method proved to have unresectable tumor at surgery. CT is about as accurate as angiography in assessing resectability of pancreatic carcinoma.

摘要

一项针对27例胰腺癌患者的回顾性研究,以内脏血管受包绕作为不可切除的标准,比较了计算机断层扫描(CT)和血管造影预测肿瘤可切除性的能力。5例患者手术时肿瘤可切除;其他22例患有不可切除疾病。18例患者通过CT检查确定内脏血管受肿瘤侵犯,19例患者通过血管造影确定。还发现其他几名患者有肝转移,总体上20例患者经影像学诊断为不可切除。基于任何一种影像学方法被认为患有不可切除疾病的所有患者,手术时均证实肿瘤不可切除。在评估胰腺癌的可切除性方面,CT与血管造影的准确性相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验