Jongen M J, Van Ginkel F C, van der Vijgh W J, Kuiper S, Netelenbos J C, Lips P
Clin Chem. 1984 Mar;30(3):399-403.
An international 19-laboratory survey was organized to compare assays for 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in plasma. Each participant received two ethanolic standard solutions of each metabolite and eight plasma samples. Each laboratory used its usual procedures. Mean interlaboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) for the eight plasma samples were 35%, 43%, and 52% for 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, respectively. Average CVs for the standard solutions were 27%, 23%, and 25%, respectively. Of the eight plasma samples, five had the same concentration for one of the metabolites. One sample was diluted to 0.6 times its original concentration and three samples were fortified with one or more of the metabolites under investigation. Fourteen of 18 laboratories (78%) could distinguish between the five unchanged samples and the modified ones with their 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay. Nine of 12 (75%) could distinguish the modified samples from the other samples with the 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D assay. Only eight of 15 (53%) could do this their 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D assay. Values from different laboratories evidently cannot be intercompared without making an actual comparison of the assay procedures. Furthermore, in case of clinical applications of these assays, each laboratory should establish its own reference values and should continually use an internal reference sample to assess the precision of the procedures.
组织了一项有19个实验室参与的国际调查,以比较血浆中25-羟基维生素D、24,25-二羟基维生素D和1,25-二羟基维生素D的检测方法。每位参与者收到了每种代谢物的两种乙醇标准溶液和八个血浆样本。每个实验室都采用其常规程序。八个血浆样本的实验室间平均变异系数(CV),25-羟基维生素D、24,25-二羟基维生素D和1,25-二羟基维生素D分别为35%、43%和52%。标准溶液的平均CV分别为27%、23%和25%。在八个血浆样本中,有五个样本的一种代谢物浓度相同。一个样本被稀释至其原始浓度的0.6倍,三个样本添加了一种或多种所研究的代谢物。18个实验室中有14个(78%)能够通过其25-羟基维生素D检测方法区分五个未改变的样本和经过处理的样本。12个实验室中有9个(75%)能够通过24,25-二羟基维生素D检测方法区分经过处理的样本和其他样本。15个实验室中只有8个(53%)能够通过其1,25-二羟基维生素D检测方法做到这一点。显然,如果不实际比较检测程序,不同实验室的值无法相互比较。此外,在这些检测方法用于临床时,每个实验室都应建立自己的参考值,并应持续使用内部参考样本评估检测程序的精密度。