• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of chronic pain.

作者信息

Lundeberg T C

出版信息

Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;523:1-51.

PMID:6609524
Abstract

The pain relieving effect of vibratory stimulation was studied in 731 patients suffering from acute pain (135 patients) or chronic pain (596 patients). Most of the patients had previously undergone treatments of various kinds without sufficient pain relief. The effect of vibratory stimulation was assessed before, during and after stimulation using different rating scales. About 70% of the patients reported reduction of pain during vibratory stimulation. In many patients there was a clear relation between the degree of reduction of pain and the intensity of pain before the beginning of stimulation. In general, relief of pain by more than 50% during stimulation was obtained in the patients who reported light, light to moderate, or moderate pain. The patients with moderate to severe, or severe pain before stimulation generally reported a reduction of pain of 50% or less. The best pain reducing site was found to be either the area of pain or close to it, the antagonistic muscle or a trigger point near the painful area. In most patients suffering from musculoskeletal pain the best pain reducing effect was obtained when the vibratory stimulation was applied with moderate pressure (at which contact was achieved with underlying bone) at a frequency of 50-150 Hz. To obtain a maximal duration of pain relief the stimulation had to be applied for 30-45 minutes. Many of the patients experienced pain relief lasting for more than 3 hours. It may be noticed that in many patients the pain relief lasted for 12 hours or more. There was a good correlation between the degree of pain relief and its duration. In the patients who experienced a pain reduction of 50% or less the pain relief generally lasted for less than 6 hours while in the patients who experienced pain relief of more than 50% it lasted for more than 6 hours. In comparison with high or low frequency TENS, vibratory stimulation was found to be as effective and in some patients even more effective in reducing chronic musculoskeletal or orofacial pain. The effect of 20 Hz, 100 Hz and 200 Hz vibratory stimulation, high frequency TENS, low frequency TENS and "placebo" vibratory stimulation was examined in various chronic musculoskeletal pain syndromes. 82% of the patients experienced a relief of pain with any of the above mentioned methods; 47% of the patients experienced a reduction of pain with vibratory stimulation or TENS stimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

相似文献

1
Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of chronic pain.
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;523:1-51.
2
Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of pain.
Am J Chin Med. 1984 Summer;12(1-4):60-70. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X84000076.
3
Effect of vibratory stimulation on experimental and clinical pain.振动刺激对实验性疼痛和临床疼痛的影响。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1988;20(4):149-59.
4
Pain alleviation by vibratory stimulation.
Pain. 1984 Sep;20(1):25-44. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90808-X.
5
Vibratory stimulation compared to placebo in alleviation of pain.与安慰剂相比,振动刺激对疼痛的缓解作用。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;19(4):153-8.
6
Two replicate randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of the time to onset of pain relief in the acute treatment of migraine with a fast-disintegrating/rapid-release formulation of sumatriptan tablets.两项关于使用舒马曲坦片速崩/速释制剂急性治疗偏头痛时疼痛缓解起效时间的重复随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Clin Ther. 2005 Apr;27(4):407-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.04.003.
7
The pain suppressive effect of vibratory stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as compared to aspirin.与阿司匹林相比,振动刺激和经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)的止痛效果。
Brain Res. 1984 Mar 5;294(2):201-9. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91031-x.
8
A comparative study of the pain alleviating effect of vibratory stimulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electroacupuncture and placebo.
Am J Chin Med. 1984 Summer;12(1-4):72-9. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X84000088.
9
Naloxone does not reverse the pain-reducing effect of vibratory stimulation.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Feb;29(2):212-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02188.x.
10
Pain reducing effect of three types of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with chronic pain: a randomized crossover trial.三种经皮电刺激神经疗法对慢性疼痛患者的止痛效果:一项随机交叉试验
Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.11.013.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel multimodal mechanical stimulation is superior to TENS to treat and prevent chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.新型多模式机械刺激在治疗和预防慢性腰痛方面优于经皮电刺激神经疗法:一项随机对照试验。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 18;6:1625420. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1625420. eCollection 2025.
2
Preventing opioid prescribing for low back pain using multimodal mechanical stimulation vs. TENS: a randomized-controlled trial.使用多模式机械刺激与经皮电刺激神经疗法预防阿片类药物用于治疗腰痛:一项随机对照试验。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;6:1612572. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1612572. eCollection 2025.
3
Local Vibratory Stimulation for Temporomandibular Disorder Myofascial Pain Treatment: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Preliminary Study.
局部振动刺激治疗颞下颌关节紊乱肌筋膜疼痛:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照初步研究。
Pain Res Manag. 2020 Dec 5;2020:6705307. doi: 10.1155/2020/6705307. eCollection 2020.
4
Whole-Body Vibration While Squatting and Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness in Women.女性深蹲时的全身振动与延迟性肌肉酸痛
J Athl Train. 2015 Dec;50(12):1233-9. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.1.02. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
5
Patient perceptions of vulvar vibration therapy for refractory vulvar pain.患者对难治性外阴疼痛的外阴振动疗法的看法。
Sex Relation Ther. 2008 Nov 1;23(4):345-353. doi: 10.1080/14681990802411685.
6
Vibratory stimulation increase the electro-cutaneous sensory detection and pain thresholds in women but not in men.振动刺激可提高女性的皮肤电感觉检测和疼痛阈值,但对男性则不然。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2006 May 23;6:20. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-6-20.
7
Relief of pain from a phantom limb by peripheral stimulation.通过外周刺激缓解幻肢痛。
J Neurol. 1985;232(2):79-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00313905.