• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过外周刺激缓解幻肢痛。

Relief of pain from a phantom limb by peripheral stimulation.

作者信息

Lundeberg T

出版信息

J Neurol. 1985;232(2):79-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00313905.

DOI:10.1007/BF00313905
PMID:2410571
Abstract

In the present study, 24 patients suffering pain from a phantom limb were given vibratory stimulation or placebo as a pain-relieving measure. During stimulation, a reduction in pain was reported by 75% of the patients as compared to 44% during placebo. Depending on the phantom sensation, the best pain-reducing site was found to be either the area of pain or the antagonistic muscle. In 90% of the patients the best pain-reducing effect was obtained when stimulation was applied with moderate pressure over a large area. The results of the present study suggest that vibratory stimulation may be a valuable symptomatic treatment measure in patients suffering pain from a phantom limb.

摘要

在本研究中,24名遭受幻肢痛的患者接受了振动刺激或安慰剂作为缓解疼痛的措施。在刺激过程中,75%的患者报告疼痛减轻,而安慰剂组为44%。根据幻肢感觉,发现最佳的疼痛减轻部位是疼痛区域或拮抗肌。在90%的患者中,当在大面积上施加适度压力进行刺激时,可获得最佳的疼痛减轻效果。本研究结果表明,振动刺激可能是治疗幻肢痛患者的一种有价值的对症治疗措施。

相似文献

1
Relief of pain from a phantom limb by peripheral stimulation.通过外周刺激缓解幻肢痛。
J Neurol. 1985;232(2):79-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00313905.
2
Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of pain.
Am J Chin Med. 1984 Summer;12(1-4):60-70. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X84000076.
3
Pain alleviation by vibratory stimulation.
Pain. 1984 Sep;20(1):25-44. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90808-X.
4
Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of chronic pain.
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;523:1-51.
5
Conservative management of phantom-limb and amputation-stump pain.幻肢痛与截肢残端痛的保守治疗
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1980 Mar;62(2):102-5.
6
Immediate and Sustained Effects of 5-Day Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Phantom Limb Pain.运动皮层5天经颅直流电刺激对幻肢痛的即时和持续影响
J Pain. 2015 Jul;16(7):657-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
7
A comparative study of the pain alleviating effect of vibratory stimulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electroacupuncture and placebo.
Am J Chin Med. 1984 Summer;12(1-4):72-9. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X84000088.
8
Naloxone does not reverse the pain-reducing effect of vibratory stimulation.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1985 Feb;29(2):212-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02188.x.
9
Decrease in phantom limb pain associated with prosthesis-induced increased use of an amputation stump in humans.人类中与假体引起的截肢残端使用增加相关的幻肢痛减轻。
Neurosci Lett. 1999 Sep 10;272(2):131-4. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(99)00595-9.
10
Robotic-Enhanced Prosthetic Liners for Vibration Therapy: Reducing Phantom Limb Pain in Transfemoral Amputees.机器人增强型义肢衬垫用于振动疗法:减少股骨截肢者的幻肢痛。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 3;24(15):5026. doi: 10.3390/s24155026.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining heterogeneity and reporting of mirror therapy intervention for phantom limb pain: A scoping review.镜像疗法干预治疗幻肢痛的异质性及报告情况审视:一项范围综述
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Mar-Apr;29(2):101165. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101165. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
Robotic-Enhanced Prosthetic Liners for Vibration Therapy: Reducing Phantom Limb Pain in Transfemoral Amputees.机器人增强型义肢衬垫用于振动疗法:减少股骨截肢者的幻肢痛。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Aug 3;24(15):5026. doi: 10.3390/s24155026.
3
Visually induced analgesia during face or limb stimulation in healthy and migraine subjects.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in primary afferent depolarization of sensory neurones during peripheral nerve regeneration in the cat.猫外周神经再生过程中感觉神经元初级传入去极化的变化。
J Physiol. 1981;313:287-99. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013665.
2
A survey of current phantom limb pain treatment in the United States.美国当前幻肢痛治疗情况的一项调查。
Pain. 1980 Feb;8(1):85-99. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90092-5.
3
The phantom phenomenon: its use and disuse.幻肢现象:其使用与不用
健康受试者和偏头痛患者在面部或肢体刺激期间的视觉诱发镇痛
J Pain Res. 2018 Sep 12;11:1821-1828. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S160276. eCollection 2018.
4
A review of the management of phantom limb pain: challenges and solutions.幻肢痛的管理综述:挑战与解决方案
J Pain Res. 2017 Aug 7;10:1861-1870. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S124664. eCollection 2017.
5
Patient perceptions of vulvar vibration therapy for refractory vulvar pain.患者对难治性外阴疼痛的外阴振动疗法的看法。
Sex Relation Ther. 2008 Nov 1;23(4):345-353. doi: 10.1080/14681990802411685.
6
Visually induced analgesia: seeing the body reduces pain.视觉诱导镇痛:看到身体可减轻疼痛。
J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12125-30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3072-09.2009.
7
Optimal treatment of phantom limb pain in the elderly.老年人幻肢痛的最佳治疗方法。
Drugs Aging. 1998 May;12(5):361-76. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199812050-00003.
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1981 Mar;57(2):99-112.
4
Phantom limb, phantom pain and stump pain in amputees during the first 6 months following limb amputation.截肢后前6个月内截肢者的幻肢、幻肢痛和残端痛。
Pain. 1983 Nov;17(3):243-256. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90097-0.
5
Vibratory stimulation for the alleviation of chronic pain.
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;523:1-51.
6
The pain suppressive effect of vibratory stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as compared to aspirin.与阿司匹林相比,振动刺激和经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)的止痛效果。
Brain Res. 1984 Mar 5;294(2):201-9. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)91031-x.
7
The effect of peripheral nerve injury on dorsal root potentials and on transmission of afferent signals into the spinal cord.外周神经损伤对背根电位及传入信号向脊髓传递的影响。
Brain Res. 1981 Mar 23;209(1):95-111. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91174-4.
8
Substance P and enkephalins in spinal cord after limb amputation.
Lancet. 1982 May 1;1(8279):1023. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92025-6.
9
Substance P in spinal cord dorsal horn decreases following peripheral nerve injury.
Brain Res. 1981 Feb 2;205(2):289-98. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)90340-1.
10
Mapping and plasticity of acid phosphatase afferents in the rat dorsal horn.大鼠背角酸性磷酸酶传入纤维的定位与可塑性
Brain Res. 1980 May 19;190(1):17-28. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(80)91156-7.