Suppr超能文献

人类视觉中的两种时空滤波器。2. 弱视、白化病和偏盲中的选择性改变。

Two spatio-temporal filters in human vision. 2. Selective modification in amblyopia, albinism, and hemianopia.

作者信息

Grounds A R, Holliday I E, Ruddock K H

出版信息

Biol Cybern. 1983;47(3):191-201. doi: 10.1007/BF00337008.

Abstract

We have used the psychophysical methods described in the first paper of this series (Holliday and Ruddock, 1983) to determine selected spatial and temporal response characteristics of the ST1 and ST2 filters for subjects suffering visual defects. Data are given for 19 amblyopes, an albino and a hemianope, and comparison data are also given for a number of subjects with normal vision. The ST1 spatial responses for both the "normal" and "amblyopic" eyes of 12 convergent strabismic amblyopes are displaced to low spatial frequencies compared to the normal curve, which implies that there is a loss of fine spatial tuning. In all but one subject, the curve for the "amblyopic" eye peaks at a spatial frequency lower than that for the "normal" eye, thus the former deviates further from the normal pattern than the latter. The ST1 spatial responses of 6 refractive amblyopes are also displaced to the low frequency side of the normal curve, although on average the shift is smaller than in the case of the strabismic amblyopes. For each subject, the response curve of the "amblyopic" eye peaks at a lower spatial frequency than does that for the "normal" eye. ST1 spatial responses were measured for targets located up to 30 degrees off-axis along the horizontal meridian and sample data are given for one strabismic and one refractive amblyope and for two normal subjects. It is concluded from these data that the changes in the spatial responses associated with amblyopia do not simply reflect eccentric fixation of the target. The ST2 spatial response was measured for the "normal" and "amblyopic" eyes of 9 amblyopes (7 strabismic and 2 refractive). There is no significant difference between the average amblyopic response and that of normal subjects, and only in one case does the response for an "amblyopic" eye peak at a frequency lower than the peak frequency for normal vision. The ST2 temporal response for 9 amblyopes shows no systematic deviations from the normal response. For the albino, both the ST1 and ST2 spatial responses peak at around 0.3 cycles deg-1, and both curves are displaced considerably to the low spatial frequency side of the normal ST2 spatial response. The albino's ST2 temporal response is essentially normal. Measurements for the hemianope's "blind" hemifield under conditions appropriate to the isolation of the ST1 and ST2 spatial responses reveal no tuning curves. The ST2 temporal response for the "blind" hemifield, however, is of large amplitude, with a peak at 2 Hz, well below the normal frequency response peak. It is argued that the loss of fine spatial tuning which occurs in the ST1, but not the ST2, spatial responses of the amblyopes is consistent with the sequential organisation of these two filter classes proposed by Holliday and Ruddock (1983). Further, for the only two subjects whose ST2 spatial response curves are displaced to abnormally low frequencies (the albino and a strabismic amblyope) the ST1 spatial response is shifted to low spatial frequencies compared to the normal ST2 curve...

摘要

我们运用了本系列第一篇论文(霍利迪和拉多克,1983年)中所描述的心理物理学方法,来确定患有视觉缺陷的受试者的ST1和ST2滤波器的选定空间和时间响应特性。给出了19名弱视患者、1名白化病患者和1名偏盲患者的数据,同时也给出了一些视力正常受试者的对比数据。与正常曲线相比,12名共同性斜视弱视患者“正常”眼和“弱视”眼的ST1空间响应都向低空间频率偏移,这意味着精细空间调谐能力丧失。除一名受试者外,在所有受试者中,“弱视”眼的曲线在低于“正常”眼的空间频率处达到峰值,因此前者比后者更偏离正常模式。6名屈光不正性弱视患者的ST1空间响应也向正常曲线的低频侧偏移,不过平均而言,这种偏移比斜视性弱视患者的情况要小。对于每个受试者,“弱视”眼的响应曲线在低于“正常”眼的空间频率处达到峰值。沿着水平子午线,对偏离光轴达30度的目标测量了ST1空间响应,并给出了一名斜视性弱视患者、一名屈光不正性弱视患者和两名正常受试者的样本数据。从这些数据可以得出结论,与弱视相关的空间响应变化并非仅仅反映目标的偏心注视。对9名弱视患者(7名斜视性和2名屈光不正性)的“正常”眼和“弱视”眼测量了ST2空间响应。弱视患者的平均响应与正常受试者的平均响应之间没有显著差异,只有在一个病例中,“弱视”眼的响应在低于正常视力峰值频率的频率处达到峰值。9名弱视患者的ST2时间响应与正常响应没有系统性偏差。对于白化病患者,ST1和ST2空间响应均在约0.3周/度处达到峰值,并且两条曲线都明显向正常ST2空间响应的低空间频率侧偏移。白化病患者的ST2时间响应基本正常。在适合分离ST1和ST2空间响应的条件下,对偏盲患者“盲”半视野的测量未发现调谐曲线。然而,“盲”半视野的ST2时间响应幅度很大,在2赫兹处达到峰值,远低于正常频率响应峰值。有人认为,弱视患者ST1空间响应中出现的精细空间调谐能力丧失,而ST2空间响应中没有,这与霍利迪和拉多克(1983年)提出的这两类滤波器的顺序组织是一致的。此外,对于仅有的两名ST2空间响应曲线向异常低频率偏移的受试者(白化病患者和一名斜视性弱视患者),与正常ST2曲线相比,ST1空间响应向低空间频率偏移……

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验