Caine M, Perlberg S, Gordon R
J Urol. 1975 Oct;114(4):564-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)67083-6.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study using the antiandrogen compound flutamide in 30 patients with benign enlargement of the prostate is reported. The potency of the compound was indicated by the large percentage of patients suffering from gynecomastia or nipple pain. Flow rate recordings are probably the most reliable and useful examination in this type of investigation, and statistical analysis of the results showed evidence of significant improvement in patients receiving flutamide. No evidence of an effect as compared to the placebo was found when the residual urine, prostate size or histological changes in prostatic biopsies were examined. Subjective effects, when carefully analyzed, provided some evidence of a preference for the flutamide group, especially in the early weeks of treatment, but the fallaciousness of subjective observations is stressed. The various problems associated with the choice and measurement of parameters to be used in this type of investigation are discussed, and the absolute necessity of proper controls and statistical analysis in such a clinical study is illustrated.
报道了一项使用抗雄激素化合物氟他胺对30例前列腺良性增生患者进行的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。该化合物的效力表现为患有乳腺增生或乳头疼痛的患者比例很高。流速记录可能是这类研究中最可靠且有用的检查方法,结果的统计分析显示,接受氟他胺治疗的患者有显著改善的迹象。在检查残余尿量、前列腺大小或前列腺活检的组织学变化时,未发现与安慰剂相比有效果的证据。经过仔细分析,主观效果提供了一些证据表明患者更倾向于氟他胺组,尤其是在治疗的最初几周,但强调了主观观察结果的谬误性。讨论了这类研究中与参数选择和测量相关的各种问题,并说明了在这类临床研究中进行适当对照和统计分析的绝对必要性。