Harvey R W, Price T H
J Hyg (Lond). 1983 Oct;91(2):267-71. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400060277.
Stools, known to have contained salmonellas were cultured in three enrichment media on arrival at the laboratory. The three media were laboratory prepared selenite F, laboratory prepared Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate and commercially obtained Oxoid Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate (CM343). Where faecal samples were sufficiently large, they were stored at room temperature and re-examined using the same three enrichment broths. Whether fresh or stored stools were investigated, the laboratory prepared media were significantly more efficient than the commercial medium. In a straight comparison of the two laboratory prepared media, no significant difference in efficiency was evident with fresh stool samples. With stored specimens, however, Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate was significantly better than selenite F. This finding might be relevant in examining samples delayed in the post.
已知含有沙门氏菌的粪便样本在抵达实验室后,在三种增菌培养基中进行培养。这三种培养基分别是实验室自制的亚硒酸盐F、实验室自制的穆勒-考夫曼四硫磺酸盐以及市售的奥克托克斯穆勒-考夫曼四硫磺酸盐(CM343)。如果粪便样本量足够大,将其保存在室温下,并用相同的三种增菌肉汤重新检测。无论检测的是新鲜粪便还是保存的粪便,实验室自制的培养基比市售培养基的效率显著更高。在直接比较两种实验室自制培养基时,新鲜粪便样本在效率上没有明显差异。然而,对于保存的样本,穆勒-考夫曼四硫磺酸盐明显优于亚硒酸盐F。这一发现可能与检测邮寄过程中延迟的样本有关。