Bell E F, Rios G R
J Pediatr. 1983 Dec;103(6):954-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(83)80729-x.
Air temperature servocontrol was compared with skin temperature servocontrol and manual control as methods for regulating the heat output of a single-walled incubator (Air-Shields C-86) (1) when optimally used in the laboratory and (2) when operated by staff nurses in the nursery. The subjects were eight premature infants with birth weights between 1.07 and 1.54 kg. When the three methods were used to produce neutral air and skin temperatures during 2-hour measurement periods in the laboratory, there were no differences in mean air, skin, or rectal temperature, metabolic heat production, or body heat loss. There were also no differences among the three methods in mean air, skin, or rectal temperature when used by the nurses in the nursery for periods of 24 hours. When incubator wall temperature is stable, air temperature servocontrol can be used as effectively as skin temperature servocontrol to operate infant incubators.
在实验室最佳使用单壁婴儿培养箱（Air-Shields C-86）时以及在新生儿重症监护室由护士操作时，将空气温度伺服控制与皮肤温度伺服控制和手动控制进行比较，作为调节培养箱热输出的方法。研究对象为8名出生体重在1.07至1.54千克之间的早产儿。在实验室进行2小时测量期间，当使用这三种方法产生中性空气温度和皮肤温度时，平均空气温度、皮肤温度或直肠温度、代谢产热或身体热量损失均无差异。当护士在新生儿重症监护室使用这三种方法24小时时，平均空气温度、皮肤温度或直肠温度也没有差异。当培养箱壁温稳定时，空气温度伺服控制在操作婴儿培养箱方面与皮肤温度伺服控制一样有效。
