Suppr超能文献

高危老年人:对常见认定风险群体的批判性审视。

The elderly at risk: a critical examination of commonly identified risk groups.

作者信息

Taylor R C, Ford E G

出版信息

J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Nov;33(256):699-705.

Abstract

This study assessed the nature and extent of the risk or disadvantage for 11 subcategories of the elderly population usually referred to as risk groups. Interviews with 619 over-60-year-olds living in Aberdeen were used to score the ;personal resources' for coping with difficulties-health, psychological, activity, confidence, support, material resources. Risk profiles have been drawn up and these show substantial variation in both the nature and extent of risk or disadvantage between the groups.Of the 11 groups, we concluded that the isolated, the childless and the never married are probably the least disadvantaged. The recently widowed, those living alone, the poor and those from social class V form an intermediate group with both strengths and weaknesses in terms of risk. The groups at greatest risk are the recently moved, recently discharged, divorced/separated and the very old, who all score worse than the whole sample in terms of health and psychological functioning.

摘要

本研究评估了通常被称为风险群体的11个老年人群体亚类面临风险或不利状况的性质和程度。通过对居住在阿伯丁的619名60岁以上老人进行访谈,对他们应对困难的“个人资源”——健康、心理、活动能力、信心、支持和物质资源进行评分。现已制定出风险概况,这些概况显示各群体在风险或不利状况的性质和程度方面存在很大差异。在这11个群体中,我们得出结论,独居者、无子女者和从未结婚者可能处于最有利的地位。最近丧偶者、独居者、贫困者以及来自社会阶层V的人构成一个中间群体,在风险方面有优势也有劣势。风险最大的群体是最近搬迁者、刚出院者、离婚/分居者以及高龄老人,他们在健康和心理功能方面的得分均低于整个样本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e5/1973000/d80a11eff550/jroyalcgprac00083-0018-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验