• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跑步时鞋垫缓冲对地面反作用力的影响。

Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.

作者信息

Clarke T E, Frederick E C, Cooper L B

出版信息

Int J Sports Med. 1983 Nov;4(4):247-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026043.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1026043
PMID:6654550
Abstract

To determine the effects of widely varying amounts of cushioning upon vertical force (VF) parameters, ten male subjects, (mean weight = 68.0 kg) ran at a speed of 4.5 m . s-1 (6 min/mile pace) and contacted a Kistler force platform. Two shoes were tested: a hard one and a softer shoe that had 50% more cushioning as measured by an instrumented impact tester. Five right footfalls were collected for each shoe on each subject during which the ground reaction forces were sampled at 500 HZ using a PDP 11/34 minicomputer. Eight parameters from the VF data obtained for each trial were selected for analysis and compared statistically using a paired difference t test. It was found [force magnitudes expressed in multiples of body weight (BW)] that the time to the vertical force impact peak (VFIP) was significantly longer (hard = 22.5 ms, soft = 26.6 ms) in the soft shoe; however, no differences were seen in the magnitudes (hard = 2.30 BW, soft = 2.34 BW). The minimum after the VFIP was also significantly delayed in the soft shoe (hard = 33.8 ms, soft = 37.9 ms) and was significantly greater in the soft shoe (hard = 1.46 BW, soft = 1.90 BW). The peak VF propulsive force occurred statistically at the same time in both shoes (hard = 85.7 ms, soft = 84.0 ms), but was significantly greater in the soft shoe (hard = 2.73 BW, soft = 2.83 BW).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为了确定大量不同程度的缓冲对垂直力(VF)参数的影响,十名男性受试者(平均体重 = 68.0千克)以4.5米·秒-1的速度(6分钟/英里配速)跑步,并接触一个奇石乐测力台。测试了两双鞋:一双硬鞋和一双软鞋,通过仪器化冲击测试仪测量,软鞋的缓冲比硬鞋多50%。在每个受试者身上,每双鞋收集五次右脚落地情况,在此期间,使用PDP 11/34小型计算机以500赫兹的频率对地面反作用力进行采样。从每次试验获得的VF数据中选择八个参数进行分析,并使用配对差异t检验进行统计学比较。结果发现[力的大小以体重(BW)的倍数表示],软鞋中垂直力冲击峰值(VFIP)出现的时间明显更长(硬鞋 = 22.5毫秒,软鞋 = 26.6毫秒);然而,力的大小没有差异(硬鞋 = 2.30 BW,软鞋 = 2.34 BW)。软鞋中VFIP之后的最小值也明显延迟(硬鞋 = 33.8毫秒,软鞋 = 37.9毫秒),并且软鞋中的最小值明显更大(硬鞋 = 1.46 BW,软鞋 = 1.90 BW)。两双鞋中VF推进力峰值在统计学上出现的时间相同(硬鞋 = 85.7毫秒,软鞋 = 84.0毫秒),但软鞋中的峰值明显更大(硬鞋 = 2.73 BW,软鞋 = 2.83 BW)。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running.跑步时鞋垫缓冲对地面反作用力的影响。
Int J Sports Med. 1983 Nov;4(4):247-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1026043.
2
Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes.使用压力鞋垫比较现代跑鞋的鞋内负荷情况。
Ergonomics. 2008 Oct;51(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1080/00140130802239562.
3
Effect of shoe cushioning on landing impact forces and spatiotemporal parameters during running: results from a randomized trial including 800+ recreational runners.鞋子缓冲对跑步时着地冲击力和时空参数的影响:一项包含 800 多名休闲跑者的随机试验结果。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2021 Jul;21(7):985-993. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1809713. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
The effects of shoe design parameters on rearfoot control in running.鞋类设计参数对跑步时后足控制的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1983;15(5):376-81.
5
Ground reaction forces and kinematics in distance running in older-aged men.老年男性长跑中的地面反作用力和运动学
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Jul;35(7):1167-75. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000074441.55707.D1.
6
Interaction between man and shoe in running: considerations for a more comprehensive measurement approach.
Int J Sports Med. 1987 Jun;8(3):196-202. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025655.
7
Differences in plantar loading between training shoes and racing flats at a self-selected running speed.在自选跑步速度下训练鞋与竞速跑鞋之间足底负荷的差异。
Gait Posture. 2009 Apr;29(3):514-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.001. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
8
Relevance of Frequency-Domain Analyses to Relate Shoe Cushioning, Ground Impact Forces and Running Injury Risk: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial With 800+ Recreational Runners.频域分析在关联鞋底缓冲、地面冲击力与跑步损伤风险中的相关性:一项针对800多名业余跑步者的随机试验的二次分析
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Nov 11;3:744658. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.744658. eCollection 2021.
9
Simultaneous measurement of back and front foot ground reaction forces during the same delivery stride of the fast-medium bowler.在快中速投球手的同一投球步幅中同时测量前脚和后脚的地面反作用力。
J Sports Sci. 2000 Dec;18(12):993-7. doi: 10.1080/026404100446793.
10
Midsole material-related force control during heel-toe running.足跟到足尖跑步过程中与中底材料相关的力控制
Res Sports Med. 2006 Jan-Mar;14(1):1-17. doi: 10.1080/15438620500528158.

引用本文的文献

1
Perception of Running Shoe Cushioning: Determining the Correspondence between Subjective Assessment and In-vitro Measurement.跑鞋缓震的感知:确定主观评估与体外测量之间的对应关系。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Jul 1;17(1):902-915. doi: 10.70252/KKCC7055. eCollection 2024.
2
Influence of altered torsional stiffness through sole modification of air pressure shoes on lower extremity biomechanical behaviour during side-step cutting maneuvers.改变气压鞋鞋底气压对侧步切入动作下肢生物力学行为的扭转刚度的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0297592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297592. eCollection 2024.
3
Towards functionally individualised designed footwear recommendation for overuse injury prevention: a scoping review.
迈向针对过度使用损伤预防的功能个性化设计鞋类推荐:一项范围综述
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov 11;15(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00760-x.
4
Evaluating footwear "in the wild": Examining wrap and lace trail shoe closures during trail running.评估野外环境中的鞋类:在越野跑过程中检查包裹式和鞋带式越野跑鞋的鞋带扣。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jan 6;4:1076609. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1076609. eCollection 2022.
5
The Bionic High-Cushioning Midsole of Shoes Inspired by Functional Characteristics of Ostrich Foot.受鸵鸟足部功能特性启发的仿生高缓冲鞋垫。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 Dec 20;10(1):1. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10010001.
6
Design feature combinations effects of running shoe on plantar pressure during heel landing: A finite element analysis with Taguchi optimization approach.跑鞋设计特征组合对足跟落地时足底压力的影响:基于田口优化方法的有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Sep 13;10:959842. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.959842. eCollection 2022.
7
Running Injury Paradigms and Their Influence on Footwear Design Features and Runner Assessment Methods: A Focused Review to Advance Evidence-Based Practice for Running Medicine Clinicians.跑步损伤模式及其对鞋类设计特点和跑步者评估方法的影响:为跑步医学临床医生推进循证实践的重点综述
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Mar 9;4:815675. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.815675. eCollection 2022.
8
Effects of midsole cushioning stiffness on Achilles tendon stretch during running.中底缓冲硬度对跑步时跟腱拉伸的影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07719-x.
9
Shoe feature recommendations for different running levels: A Delphi study.不同跑步水平的鞋款特征推荐:德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 16;15(7):e0236047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236047. eCollection 2020.
10
Do Strike Patterns or Shoe Conditions have a Predominant Influence on Foot Loading?击球方式或鞋子状况对足部负荷有主要影响吗?
J Hum Kinet. 2018 Oct 15;64:13-23. doi: 10.1515/hukin-2017-0205. eCollection 2018 Sep.