Wiles C M, Karni Y
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;46(11):1006-13. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.46.11.1006.
The variability of voluntary isometric strength measurements has been assessed in normal subjects and patients with peripheral neuromuscular disorders. Knee extensor strength was measured in a muscle testing chair 13 times over 5 months in each of six normal subjects: coefficients of variation (CV) ranged from 4.5 to 14.0% (mean 8.5%) for individual legs in different subjects. Paired measurements of the strength of several clinically weak muscle groups were made 1-4 days apart in 20 patients using both a handheld dynamometer and the muscle chair technique: the test/retest correlation was high (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001). Visual biofeedback did not affect the strength recorded in most cases. Each of five patients had the strength of six or seven clinically weak muscle groups measured by five examiners within a 24 hour period: the CV for the five examiners ranged from 3.6-27.3% (mean 12.8%). A single examiner measuring the same groups on five occasions in three patients obtained a mean CV of 8.9%. Sources of variation are analysed and it is concluded that, with certain precautions, voluntary strength measurements offer a simple, reliable and acceptable method for monitoring change in patients.
已对正常受试者和患有周围神经肌肉疾病的患者进行了自愿性等长肌力测量的变异性评估。在肌肉测试椅上,对6名正常受试者的膝伸肌力量在5个月内进行了13次测量:不同受试者单腿的变异系数(CV)范围为4.5%至14.0%(平均8.5%)。在20名患者中,使用手持测力计和肌肉椅技术,在1至4天的间隔内对几个临床虚弱肌肉群的力量进行了配对测量:重测相关性很高(r = 0.97,p < 0.001)。在大多数情况下,视觉生物反馈不影响记录的力量。5名患者中的每一位都在24小时内由5名检查人员对6或7个临床虚弱肌肉群的力量进行了测量:5名检查人员的CV范围为3.6%至27.3%(平均12.8%)。对变异来源进行了分析,得出的结论是,采取某些预防措施后,自愿性力量测量为监测患者的变化提供了一种简单、可靠且可接受的方法。