Alleva E, de Acetis L, Amorico L, Bignami G
Behav Neural Biol. 1983 Sep;39(1):78-104. doi: 10.1016/s0163-1047(83)90654-4.
A literature survey and preliminary experiments with rats on the consequences of shock preexposure on subsequent activity and escape or avoidance showed the need for further work on the interactions between nondebilitating preshock and various test and treatment factors. The two main experiments used 16 preexposure conditions, namely, presence or absence of unavoidable punishment (36 shocks of 2.5 mA and 5 sec subdivided in three daily sessions), a light CS, a central partition in the shuttle-box, and dl-amphetamine sulfate (1 mg/kg ip 15 min before each session). In both experiments the four factors studied exerted more than additive effects on activity in preexposure sessions, leading to a very high frequency of crossing in the CS-shock-no-partition-drug condition. Upon retesting for activity (Experiment 1) suppression of locomotion by prior shock was less marked in animals preexposed to CS-US pairings in the absence of partition, while proactive amphetamine effects consisted mainly of a progressive increase of activity over successive retest sessions in the groups not preshocked. Upon retesting for light-cued, two-way avoidance acquisition (Experiment 2) the groups preexposed to US only were mostly retarded, while those preexposed to paired CS and US were mostly facilitated. Other changes, including drug pretreatment consequences, were negligible or unsystematic, but in general the data showed that the effects of various preexposure conditions on activity could not account for those on avoidance. Overall, it appears that the interactions between nondebilitating preshock and other test and treatment factors can be further exploited to clarify the respective roles of various associative and nonassociative mechanisms in modulation of activity and adaptive responding in aversive situations.
一项文献综述以及对大鼠进行的关于休克预暴露对后续活动及逃避或回避行为影响的初步实验表明,有必要进一步研究非衰弱性休克前暴露与各种测试及治疗因素之间的相互作用。两项主要实验采用了16种预暴露条件,即有无不可避免的惩罚(36次2.5毫安、持续5秒的电击,分三天进行,每天三次)、一个光条件刺激、穿梭箱中的中央隔板以及硫酸右苯丙胺(每次实验前15分钟腹腔注射1毫克/千克)。在两项实验中,所研究的这四个因素对预暴露阶段的活动产生了超过累加的效应,导致在光条件刺激-电击-无隔板-药物条件下穿越频率非常高。在对活动进行重新测试时(实验1),对于在无隔板情况下预先暴露于条件刺激-非条件刺激配对的动物,先前电击对运动的抑制作用不太明显,而主动的苯丙胺效应主要表现为在未预先遭受电击的组中,活动在连续的重新测试阶段逐渐增加。在对光提示的双向回避习得进行重新测试时(实验2),仅预先暴露于非条件刺激的组大多表现出学习迟缓,而预先暴露于条件刺激和非条件刺激配对的组大多表现出学习促进。其他变化,包括药物预处理的后果,可忽略不计或无系统性,但总体而言,数据表明各种预暴露条件对活动的影响无法解释其对回避行为的影响。总体看来,非衰弱性休克前暴露与其他测试及治疗因素之间的相互作用可进一步加以利用,以阐明各种联想和非联想机制在厌恶情境中对活动调节和适应性反应的各自作用。