Cotruvo J A
Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Nov;53:181-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8353181.
The conference is briefly reviewed in the light of its impact on future regulatory decisions regarding the possible control of asbestos fiber in drinking water. The results of animal feeding studies indicate that asbestos fails to demonstrate toxicity in whole-animal lifetime exposures. The epidemiologic evidence of risk from ingestion of water containing asbestos fibers is not convincing, and in view of the lack of confirmation by animal studies, the existence of a risk has not been proven; however occupational gastrointestinal cancer may indicate ingestion risk. Whether or not there is a risk from asbestos in drinking water, however, common sense tells us to deal with an undesirable situation by employing means that are commonly and economically available. Well-known methods can minimize the presence of asbestos fibers in finished drinking water. In the case of natural fiber in raw water, standard or augmented filtration practices are extremely effective. If the source of asbestos fiber is asbestos-cement pipe that is being attacked by corrosive water, then, there is more than sufficient economic reason to correct the corrosivity of the water.
鉴于该会议对未来关于饮用水中石棉纤维可能控制的监管决策的影响,对其进行简要回顾。动物喂养研究结果表明,在全动物终生暴露中,石棉未显示出毒性。摄入含石棉纤维水的风险的流行病学证据并不令人信服,鉴于动物研究未予证实,风险的存在尚未得到证明;然而职业性胃肠道癌症可能表明存在摄入风险。然而,无论饮用水中石棉是否存在风险,常识告诉我们应采用常见且经济可行的方法来处理不良情况。众所周知的方法可将成品饮用水中石棉纤维的存在降至最低。对于原水中的天然纤维,标准或强化过滤措施极为有效。如果石棉纤维的来源是受到腐蚀性水侵蚀的石棉水泥管,那么,有充分的经济理由纠正水的腐蚀性。