Suppr超能文献

比较用于风险评估的摄入性石棉的流行病学研究。

Comparing epidemiologic studies of ingested asbestos for use in risk assessment.

作者信息

Erdreich L S

出版信息

Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Nov;53:99-104. doi: 10.1289/ehp.835399.

Abstract

Epidemiologic data can be used in risk assessment in various ways: to calculate the dose-response relationship between exposure levels and adverse effects; to establish ranges of exposure known to be safe or unsafe; to verify an endpoint in humans derived from a route or species extrapolation; to support assumptions necessary for performing extrapolation procedures. These points are illustrated in the risk assessment for exposure to asbestos in drinking water. A previous risk assessment for asbestos, the EPA's Ambient Water Quality Criteria (AWQC) for Asbestos, was derived from cohort studies of inhalation exposure. Epidemiologic studies of ingested asbestos, all of geographical correlation design, were compared on the basis of their ability to add information in support of both the route extrapolation and low-dose extrapolation used in this risk assessment. Results of these ingestion studies were inconsistent due to variable ability to detect a risk from chronic low-level exposure. After preliminary comparisons of factors that determine scientific validity and statistical power, two ingestion studies were selected to determine if they had the potential to detect the risk predicted by the AWQC. This evaluation has shown that these studies do not offer quantitative data for estimating levels associated with a defined risk. Due to short exposure duration and limited power, clearly safe and clearly unsafe ranges could not be definitely identified. The most appropriate ingestion studies suggest, but do not prove, the endpoint derived from the route extrapolation in the AWQC.

摘要

流行病学数据可通过多种方式用于风险评估

计算暴露水平与不良反应之间的剂量反应关系;确定已知安全或不安全的暴露范围;验证从一种途径或物种外推得出的人体终点;支持进行外推程序所需的假设。这些要点在饮用水中石棉暴露的风险评估中得到了体现。先前对石棉的风险评估,即美国环境保护局(EPA)的石棉环境水质标准(AWQC),源自吸入暴露的队列研究。对摄入石棉的流行病学研究,均为地理相关性设计,根据它们在支持本风险评估中使用的途径外推和低剂量外推方面增加信息的能力进行了比较。由于检测慢性低水平暴露风险的能力不同,这些摄入研究的结果不一致。在对决定科学有效性和统计效力的因素进行初步比较后,选择了两项摄入研究来确定它们是否有可能检测出AWQC预测的风险。该评估表明,这些研究并未提供用于估计与特定风险相关水平的定量数据。由于暴露持续时间短且效力有限,无法明确确定明显安全和明显不安全的范围。最恰当的摄入研究表明,但并未证明,AWQC中从途径外推得出的终点。

相似文献

2
Asbestos in drinking water: a status report.饮用水中的石棉:一份现状报告。
Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Nov;53:181-3. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8353181.
4
Asbestos in drinking water: a Canadian view.饮用水中的石棉:加拿大的观点。
Environ Health Perspect. 1983 Nov;53:177-80. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8353177.
6
A review and critique of U.S. EPA's risk assessments for asbestos.美国环保署石棉风险评估的回顾与批判。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2014 Jul;44(6):499-522. doi: 10.3109/10408444.2014.902423. Epub 2014 May 7.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验