Suppr超能文献

评估员工滥用职权的可能性。

Assessing employee potentials for abuse.

作者信息

Haddock M D, McQueen W M

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1983 Nov;39(6):1021-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198311)39:6<1021::aid-jclp2270390635>3.0.co;2-7.

Abstract

Attempted to develop a battery of questionnaires and demographic data capable of early identification of institutional caretakers with potential for abuse of a client. After an extensive literature review on institutional client abuse, it was determined that the Child Abuse Potential Inventory, Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire and a General Information Form would account for a significant amount of variance to discriminate an abusive employee from a matched non-abusive employee. The questionnaires were administered to 21 abusing and 21 matched non-abusing employees. A univariate analysis, multiple regression, and a discriminate function analysis revealed that 73% of the between-group variance was accounted for by 8 of the suggested variables. The sensitivity of these tests, the ability to identify correctly 21 known abusers, was 86%. The specificity, the ability to identify correctly 21 matched non-abusers, was 100%. The proportion of grouped cases correctly classified was 93%.

摘要

试图开发一系列问卷和人口统计学数据,以便能够早期识别出有可能虐待客户的机构看护人员。在对机构客户虐待问题进行广泛的文献综述之后,确定《虐待儿童潜在性量表》、《明尼苏达满意度问卷》和一份一般信息表能够解释大量差异,从而区分有虐待行为的员工和配对的无虐待行为员工。这些问卷被发放给21名有虐待行为的员工和21名配对的无虐待行为员工。单变量分析、多元回归分析和判别函数分析表明,建议的8个变量解释了73%的组间差异。这些测试的敏感度,即正确识别21名已知施虐者的能力,为86%。特异度,即正确识别21名配对的无虐待行为者的能力,为100%。正确分类的分组病例比例为93%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验