LaTorre R A
Arch Sex Behav. 1978 Mar;7(2):89-96. doi: 10.1007/BF01542058.
Three hundred and sixty-six university students (158 males and 208 females) completed a three-part questionnaire. The first two parts consisted of self-report inventories to assess psychological adjustment (Eysenck's Neuroticism Scale and Lanyon's Alienation Scale). The third part assessed gender role (Bem's Sex Role Inventory). Androgyny was scored as per both the Bem (1974) system and the Spence et al. (1975) system, and the groups obtained by these two systems were separately analyzed for differences in psychological adjustment scores. Feminine individuals (regardless of biological gender or system of classification) obtained less adjusted scores, and this was especially significant for males. It was also found that the Spence et al. system had more predictive power than the Bem system for classifying individuals.
366名大学生（158名男性和208名女性）完成了一份由三部分组成的问卷。问卷的前两部分是用于评估心理调适的自评量表（艾森克神经质量表和兰扬疏离感量表）。第三部分评估性别角色（贝姆性别角色量表）。双性化按照贝姆（1974年）系统和斯彭斯等人（1975年）系统进行评分，对通过这两个系统得出的分组分别分析心理调适分数的差异。女性化个体（无论生理性别或分类系统如何）的调适分数较低，这在男性中尤为显著。研究还发现，在对个体进行分类时，斯彭斯等人的系统比贝姆系统具有更强的预测能力。
