• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

竞争性就业中的社会验证:评估工作绩效。

Social validation in competitive employment: evaluating work performance.

作者信息

White D M, Rusch F R

出版信息

Appl Res Ment Retard. 1983;4(4):343-54. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(83)90034-6.

DOI:10.1016/0270-3092(83)90034-6
PMID:6670871
Abstract

Social validation is a methodology utilized to evaluate the social acceptability of treatment goals, procedures, and results of applied interventions. This methodology lends itself well to assessing the work performance of mentally retarded individuals in nonsheltered employment settings, i.e., competitive employment. In this investigation, work evaluations provided by managers, shift supervisors, nonhandicapped co-workers, and mentally retarded workers (self) were analyzed. Results indicated significant differences across rater groups with regard to worker evaluation. Mentally retarded individuals rated their own work behavior most positively, followed by co-workers, shift supervisors, and managers, respectively. Rater groups disagreed particularly with respect to evaluating mentally retarded workers' job skills and interpersonal relationships in the job environment. Implications of these findings to the issues of concordance and consumer validation are discussed.

摘要

社会效度是一种用于评估治疗目标、程序以及应用干预结果的社会可接受性的方法。这种方法非常适合评估智力障碍个体在非庇护性就业环境(即竞争性就业)中的工作表现。在本次调查中,分析了经理、轮班主管、非残疾同事以及智力障碍员工(自评)提供的工作评估。结果表明,不同评分者群体在对员工的评估上存在显著差异。智力障碍个体对自己工作行为的评价最为积极,其次分别是同事、轮班主管和经理。评分者群体在评估智力障碍员工的工作技能和工作环境中的人际关系方面存在特别大的分歧。讨论了这些发现对一致性和消费者效度问题的影响。

相似文献

1
Social validation in competitive employment: evaluating work performance.竞争性就业中的社会验证:评估工作绩效。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1983;4(4):343-54. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(83)90034-6.
2
Competitive employment: assessing employee reactivity to naturalistic observation.竞争性就业:评估员工对自然观察的反应
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1984;5(3):339-51. doi: 10.1016/s0270-3092(84)80055-7.
3
Comparison between nonhandicapped and mentally retarded workers: why they lose their jobs.非残障工人与智障工人的比较:他们为何失去工作。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1986;7(4):467-74. doi: 10.1016/s0270-3092(86)80019-4.
4
Reasons for job loss: a review of employment termination studies of mentally retarded workers.失业原因:对智障工人就业终止研究的综述
Res Dev Disabil. 1988;9(2):153-70. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(88)90049-2.
5
Assessing the problematic interpersonal skills of mentally retarded individuals in a vocational setting.
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1982;3(1):37-53. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(82)90057-1.
6
Social validation of heterosexual social behavior in community settings: a comparison of mentally retarded and non-mentally retarded adults.社区环境中异性社交行为的社会验证:智障与非智障成年人的比较。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1985;6(4):421-35. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(85)90018-9.
7
An analysis of employer evaluations of workers with mental retardation.
Res Dev Disabil. 1988;9(4):377-91. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(88)90032-7.
8
Evaluating the degree of concordance between employers' evaluations of work behavior.评估雇主对工作行为评价之间的一致程度。
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1983;4(2):95-102. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(83)90002-4.
9
Job interview training for the mentally retarded: issues and applications.为智障人士提供的求职面试培训:问题与应用
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1983;4(4):355-67. doi: 10.1016/0270-3092(83)90035-8.
10
Behaviors that contribute to entry-level employment. A profile of five jobs.
Appl Res Ment Retard. 1986;7(3):299-314. doi: 10.1016/s0270-3092(86)80003-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Overview of supported employment.支持性就业概述。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1989 Winter;22(4):351-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1989.22-351.