Moses J A, Thompson L L, Cardellino J P, Johnson G L
Int J Neurosci. 1983 Oct;21(1-2):119-27. doi: 10.3109/00207458308986127.
Various decision rules have been advanced for evaluation of brain dysfunction with the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery in a chronic schizophrenic or schizoaffective disorder psychotic population. The rules of Golden (1981a) produced the highest hit rate of 96% for identification of schizophrenics who had normal neurological examination findings as not brain damaged. Most of the psychotic profile decision rules, however, produced high false negative hit rates with known brain damaged cases. The critical level decision rules (Golden, Moses, Graber, & Berg, 1981) had the highest hit rate (76.7%) with the known brain-damaged sample. Optimal classification of diagnostic groups appeared to be facilitated by use of decision rules that were especially designed for the psychotic and brain-damaged groups, respectively.
对于慢性精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍精神病患者群体，已经提出了各种决策规则来评估使用鲁利亚-内布拉斯加神经心理成套测验时的脑功能障碍情况。戈尔登（1981a）的规则在识别神经系统检查结果正常的精神分裂症患者无脑损伤方面产生了最高的命中率，为96%。然而，大多数精神病剖面图决策规则在已知脑损伤病例中产生了较高的假阴性命中率。临界水平决策规则（戈尔登、摩西、格拉伯和伯格，1981）在已知脑损伤样本中具有最高的命中率（76.7%）。分别为精神病组和脑损伤组专门设计的决策规则似乎有助于诊断组的最佳分类。
