• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Construction of semantic scales for the subjective evaluation of noise].

作者信息

Verzini de Romera A M, Biassoni de Serra E C, Suárez de Bonet M D

出版信息

Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat. 1983 Dec;29(4):301-6.

PMID:6673517
Abstract

This is the first stage of a research the aim of which is to construct proper scales for the subjective evaluation of noise, using Osgood's Differential Semantic Technique. 137 adjectives were selected using two criteria. For the first criterium a method based on Gougenheim's and Hogenraad's researches was used. 200 subjects were asked to write 30 adjectives that could be used for qualifying sonorous stimuli. The frequencies of the adjectives given by the subjects were calculated and 25 of them were selected for being under the 10% limit of the probability, arbitrarily chosen as a criterium for the selection. For the second criterium 10 acoustic researchers were asked to write all those adjectives they considered important for noise evaluation. Thus, 112 adjectives were selected. The 137 adjectives got by the two criteria were judged by 15 university professors of different careers, for getting their opposites. A level of agreement of at least 6 of 15 judges was considered. 62 adjectives with their opposites were got and using other two criteria they were reduced to 37. A hypothesis was formulated grouping the adjectives into 8 factors taking into account the three universal factors: Evaluation (E), Potency (P) and Activity (A) according to the Differential Semantic Technique. Seven point scales were constructed with the adjectives. The construction of the scales, the selection of concepts, the application of them to a sample of subjects and data analysis will be the second stage of this research.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Construction of semantic scales for the subjective evaluation of noise].
Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat. 1983 Dec;29(4):301-6.
2
[Semantic scales for noise evaluation. Third stage: subjective characterization of sound stimuli].
Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat. 1987 Sep;33(3):241-50.
3
[Semantic scales for the evaluation of noise (II). Subjacent dimensions in subjective judgments of sound stimuli].[噪声评估的语义量表(II)。声音刺激主观判断中的潜在维度]
Acta Psiquiatr Psicol Am Lat. 1984 Dec;30(4):265-73.
4
[Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].[完美主义中的失败影响与性别差异]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):125-35.
5
[Osgood's semantic differential in psychopathology: a differential study].[奥斯古德心理病理学语义差异量表:一项差异研究]
Actas Luso Esp Neurol Psiquiatr Cienc Afines. 1991 May-Jun;19(3):149-53.
6
Clinical evaluation of higher stimulation rates in the nucleus research platform 8 system.核研究平台8系统中更高刺激率的临床评估
Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):381-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31804793ac.
7
Multichannel NIRS analysis of brain activity during semantic differential rating of drawing stimuli containing different affective polarities.对包含不同情感极性的绘画刺激进行语义差异评分时大脑活动的多通道近红外光谱分析。
Neurosci Lett. 2005 Feb 25;375(1):53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.065. Epub 2004 Dec 8.
8
Semantic evaluations of noise with tonal components in Japan, France, and Germany: a cross-cultural comparison.日本、法国和德国对带有音调成分的噪声的语义评估:一项跨文化比较。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):850-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3050275.
9
Using semantic differentials in fieldwork.在实地调查中使用语义差异法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):116-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00666.x.
10
Personal noise ranking of road traffic: subjective estimation versus physiological parameters under laboratory conditions.道路交通的个人噪声等级:实验室条件下的主观估计与生理参数
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2007 Mar;210(2):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2006.08.007. Epub 2006 Nov 3.