Suppr超能文献

通过排阻色谱法分离用于诊断目的的IgM:六种凝胶的比较

Separation of IgM for diagnostic purposes by exclusion chromatography: a comparison between six gels.

作者信息

Angeretti A, Merlino C, Negro Ponzi A

出版信息

Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1983;62(6):501-8.

PMID:6677263
Abstract

Sera from rubella patients were fractionated with six different gels on a 0.9 X 30 cm column. Fractionation efficiency was evaluated by determining the IgM, IgA and IgG concentrations in each fraction and titring the rubella virus hemagglutination-inhibiting antibodies before and after treatment with 2-mercaptoethanol. All six gels were able to separate IgM from the other Ig, but the distance between their elution peaks varied considerably. Assessment of the usefulness of a gel for diagnostic purposes requires evaluation of its ability to separate IgM from the oligometric IgA often present in sera and a possible source of diagnostic error. Ultrogel AcA 22 and Bio-Gel A5m gave the best results. In addition to displaying good peak separation, they eluted IgM within their linear fractionation range.

摘要

将风疹患者的血清在0.9×30 cm的柱上用六种不同的凝胶进行分级分离。通过测定每个级分中的IgM、IgA和IgG浓度,并在用2-巯基乙醇处理前后滴定风疹病毒血凝抑制抗体,来评估分级分离效率。所有六种凝胶都能够将IgM与其他Ig分离,但它们洗脱峰之间的距离差异很大。评估一种凝胶用于诊断目的的实用性需要评估其将IgM与血清中经常存在的寡聚IgA分离的能力以及可能的诊断误差来源。Ultrogel AcA 22和Bio-Gel A5m给出了最佳结果。除了显示出良好的峰分离外,它们还在其线性分级分离范围内洗脱IgM。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验