Rowland F N, Donovan M J, Lindsay M, Weiss W I, O'Rourke J, Kreutzer D L
Am J Pathol. 1983 Jan;110(1):1-12.
Although some investigations have demonstrated the ability of inflammatory mediators, including vasopermeability and chemotactic factors, to induce acute inflammatory reactions in vivo, little is known about the response of various elements of the anterior segment to the direct effects of inflammatory mediators. These studies were initiated to develop models for the investigation of inflammatory responses in this region of the eye. Acute inflammatory reactions were induced within the rabbit anterior chamber by intracameral injection of 50 microliters of various inflammatory mediators and were evaluated by clinical grade, leukocyte influx into the aqueous humor, and morphologic changes in the corneal endothelium. Peak responses were recorded following injection of 10(-4) M formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP); 5 ED50 C5fr; 0.5 mg/ml C5; undiluted anti-red blood cell (RBC) serum; and 10(-5) M histamine. The number of leukocytes per milliliter of aqueous humor induced by each mediator was quantitated by comparison with the number of leukocytes induced by buffer instillation into a separate group of rabbits (mediator-induced influx/buffer-induced influx). Comparisons were made 24 hours after instillation of mediators. The results of these studies were as follows: buffer alone, 1.0; fMLP, 3.1 C5fr, 61.0; C5, 8.7; anti-RBC, 91.0; and histamine, 24.0. Clinical grades correlated well with these ratios. In addition, differences were noted when the time kinetics of acute responses induced by two different mediators (10(-4) M fMLP, a synthetic preformed chemotactic factor; and a 1:5 dilution of anti-RBC, which binds to vascular and corneal endothelial cells) were directly compared over 48 hours. Responses induced with fMLP peaked between 5 and 8 hours and resolved rapidly, whereas anti-RBC-induced responses peaked between 8 and 12 hours and resolved very slowly. Histopathologic analysis indicated that both fMLP and anti-RBC induced a similar sequence of changes in the corneal endothelium. Within 2-3 hours after instillation of either mediator, the endothelial cells exhibited prominent vacuolization/retraction phenomena. At the peak of leukocyte influx PMNs filled these vacuoles, then migrated back into the aqueous humor within several hours. Normal morphologic features were recovered following clearance of leukocytes from the anterior chamber. We believe that these models will be useful in identifying the roles of individual mediators in acute and chronic endocular inflammation and in the injury of corneal endothelium.
尽管一些研究已证明包括血管通透性和趋化因子在内的炎症介质能够在体内诱导急性炎症反应,但眼前节各成分对炎症介质直接作用的反应却知之甚少。开展这些研究是为了建立用于研究眼的该区域炎症反应的模型。通过前房内注射50微升各种炎症介质在兔眼前房内诱导急性炎症反应,并通过临床分级、房水中白细胞流入情况以及角膜内皮的形态学变化进行评估。在注射10(-4)M甲酰甲硫氨酰亮氨酰苯丙氨酸(fMLP)、5个半数有效剂量的C5fr、0.5mg/ml的C5、未稀释的抗红细胞(RBC)血清以及10(-5)M组胺后记录到峰值反应。通过将每种介质诱导的每毫升房水中白细胞数量与向另一组兔眼滴注缓冲液诱导的白细胞数量进行比较(介质诱导的流入量/缓冲液诱导的流入量)来定量每种介质诱导的白细胞数量。在滴注介质24小时后进行比较。这些研究结果如下:单独使用缓冲液为1.0;fMLP为3.1;C5fr为61.0;C5为8.7;抗RBC为91.0;组胺为24.0。临床分级与这些比率密切相关。此外,当直接比较两种不同介质(10(-4)M fMLP,一种合成的预形成趋化因子;以及1:5稀释的抗RBC,其与血管和角膜内皮细胞结合)诱导的急性反应的时间动力学时,在48小时内观察到差异。fMLP诱导的反应在5至8小时达到峰值并迅速消退,而抗RBC诱导的反应在8至12小时达到峰值且消退非常缓慢。组织病理学分析表明,fMLP和抗RBC在角膜内皮中诱导了相似的变化序列。在滴注任何一种介质后2至3小时内,内皮细胞出现明显的空泡化/回缩现象。在白细胞流入峰值时,中性粒细胞充满这些空泡,然后在数小时内迁移回房水。前房内白细胞清除后恢复正常形态特征。我们认为这些模型将有助于确定个体介质在急性和慢性眼内炎症以及角膜内皮损伤中的作用。