Fleming S M, Peters G M, Weaver A W, Al-Sarraf M, Schumacher M E, Carey M K
Cancer. 1983 Feb 15;51(4):610-3. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19830215)51:4<610::aid-cncr2820510410>3.0.co;2-y.
Hearing threshold differences postcis-platinum, relative to precis-platinum levels, were studied in 21 men from a Veterans Administration Medical Center. These patients had previously untreated advanced epidermoid cancers of the head and neck. Each patient received one of three drug combinations: (1) cis-platinum, Oncovin, and bleomycin (n = 9); (2) cis-platinum and 5-fluorouracil (n = 7); or (3) cis-platinum and bleomycin (n = 5). Wide variations in prechemotherapy hearing thresholds prevented analysis among various drug combinations. Therefore, the three groups were pooled to compare the thresholds by frequency. The frequencies tested and analyzed were: 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, 4000 Hz, and 8000 Hz. Significant differences were found at 2000 Hz (P less than 0.01) and 8000 Hz (P less than 0.05). Any existing ototoxic effects of cis-platinum may have been overridden by already high prechemotherapy hearing thresholds at 4000 Hz. Since 2000 Hz was most sensitive to the ototoxic effects of cis-platinum it is suggested that this frequency be monitored routinely as a part of standard chemotherapy assessment.
对来自一家退伍军人管理局医疗中心的21名男性患者,研究了顺铂治疗后相对于治疗前顺铂水平的听力阈值差异。这些患者此前患有未经治疗的晚期头颈部表皮样癌。每位患者接受三种药物组合之一:(1)顺铂、长春新碱和博来霉素(n = 9);(2)顺铂和5-氟尿嘧啶(n = 7);或(3)顺铂和博来霉素(n = 5)。化疗前听力阈值的广泛差异使得无法对各种药物组合进行分析。因此,将这三组合并以按频率比较阈值。测试和分析的频率为:250Hz、500Hz、1000Hz、2000Hz、4000Hz和8000Hz。在2000Hz(P < 0.01)和8000Hz(P < 0.05)时发现有显著差异。顺铂现有的任何耳毒性作用可能已被4000Hz处已经较高的化疗前听力阈值所掩盖。由于2000Hz对顺铂的耳毒性作用最敏感,建议将该频率作为标准化疗评估的一部分进行常规监测。