Inouye I, Massie B, Loge D, Topic N, Silverstein D, Simpson P, Tubau J
Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jan 1;53(1):120-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90695-7.
This study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and significance of diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Rest and exercise equilibrium blood pool scintigraphy was performed in 39 hypertensive subjects (mean systolic blood pressure [BP] 156 +/- 14 mm Hg [+/- standard deviation]; mean diastolic BP 103 +/- 5 mm Hg) and 11 normal control subjects. These studies were analyzed for ejection fraction (EF), segmental wall motion, peak filling rate (PFR), time to PFR and filling fraction in the first third of diastole normalized for cycle length (first-third filling fraction). EF at rest was similar in the hypertensive patients and control subjects (0.63 +/- 0.09 versus 0.65 +/- 0.07); only 2 patients had a reduced EF. The EF response to exercise was normal in every hypertensive patient (increasing to a mean of 0.74 +/- 0.08); only 1 patient had asynergy. In contrast, even when the 2 patients with abnormal systolic function were excluded, each index of diastolic filling was significantly different from the control group. PFR was lower (2.29 +/- 0.49 vs 2.63 +/- 0.39 end-diastolic volumes per second [EDV/s], p less than 0.05), time to PFR was longer (199 +/- 47 versus 158 +/- 17 ms/s), p less than 0.01) and first-third filling fraction was smaller (0.38 +/- 0.11 vs 0.60 +/- 0.07, p less than 0.001). The latter index fell below the lowest normal value in 84% of the hypertensive patients. The degree of diastolic filling abnormality was not related to the patients' age, heart rate, BP, duration of systemic hypertension or systolic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在确定轻至中度系统性高血压患者舒张期左心室(LV)功能障碍的患病率及其意义。对39例高血压患者(平均收缩压[BP]156±14mmHg[±标准差];平均舒张压BP 103±5mmHg)和11例正常对照者进行了静息和运动平衡血池闪烁扫描。分析这些研究的射血分数(EF)、节段性室壁运动、峰值充盈率(PFR)、达到PFR的时间以及舒张期前三分之一的充盈分数(以心动周期长度标准化,即前三分之一充盈分数)。高血压患者和对照者静息时的EF相似(分别为0.63±0.09和0.65±0.07);仅2例患者EF降低。每位高血压患者运动时的EF反应正常(平均增加至0.74±0.08);仅1例患者有运动不同步。相比之下,即使排除2例收缩功能异常的患者,舒张期充盈的各项指标仍与对照组有显著差异。PFR较低(分别为2.29±0.49和2.63±0.39每搏末舒张末期容积/秒[EDV/s],p<0.05),达到PFR的时间较长(分别为199±47和158±17毫秒/秒,p<0.01),前三分之一充盈分数较小(分别为0.38±0.1和0.60±0.07,p<0.001)。84%的高血压患者后一项指标低于正常最低值。舒张期充盈异常的程度与患者年龄、心率、血压、系统性高血压病程或收缩功能无关。(摘要截短于250字)