Limiting state regulation of reproductive decisions.
作者信息
Glantz L H
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1984 Feb;74(2):168-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.2.168.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Limiting state regulation of reproductive decisions.限制国家对生殖决策的管控。
Am J Public Health. 1984 Feb;74(2):168-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.2.168.
2
The legacy of Justice William Brennan.
Hum Life Rev. 1998 Winter;24(1):65-76.
4
Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
J Fam Law. 1984;23(2):267-86.
5
The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.最高法院的春季开庭期：堕胎、死亡权与隐私权的式微
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1990 Winter;15(4):919-28. doi: 10.1215/03616878-15-4-919.
6
Roe v. Wade reaffirmed.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1983 Aug;13(4):21-2.
7
Planned Parenthood v Casey.计划生育联盟诉凯西案
JAMA. 1993 Dec 1;270(21):2559; author reply 2559-60. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.21.2559b.
8
Planned Parenthood v Casey. The impact of the new undue burden standard on reproductive health care.计划生育联盟诉凯西案。新的不当负担标准对生殖保健的影响。
JAMA. 1993 May 5;269(17):2249-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.17.2249.
9
The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class.最高法院、堕胎与阶级法理学。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Nov;82(11):1556-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.11.1556.
10
Abortion and informed consent requirements.堕胎与知情同意要求。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Sep 1;144(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(82)90384-2.
引用本文的文献
1
Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters.堕胎与最高法院：为何立法动机至关重要。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Dec;76(12):1452-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.12.1452.
Zotero 插件