Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters.
作者信息
Glantz L H
出版信息
Am J Public Health. 1986 Dec;76(12):1452-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.12.1452.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Abortion and the Supreme Court: why legislative motive matters.堕胎与最高法院：为何立法动机至关重要。
Am J Public Health. 1986 Dec;76(12):1452-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.76.12.1452.
2
Roe v. Wade reaffirmed, again.罗诉韦德案再次得到重申。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1986 Oct;16(5):26-7.
3
Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote.大法官以微弱多数票维持堕胎权。
N Y Times Web. 1986 Jun 12:A1, B10-11.
4
American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh.
Fed Report. 1984 May 31;737:283-319.
5
June, bioethics and the Supreme Court.6月，生物伦理学与最高法院。
J Med Philos. 1986 Aug;11(3):285-90. doi: 10.1093/jmp/11.3.285.
6
Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.最高法院议程上的堕胎问题：计划生育联盟诉凯西案及其可能的后果。
Law Med Health Care. 1992 Fall;20(3):243-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01197.x.
7
Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.桑伯格诉美国妇产科医师学会案
Wests Supreme Court Report. 1986 Jun 11;106:2169-216.
8
Jane L. v. Bangerter.
Fed Report. 1995 Aug 2;61:1493-505.
9
The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.女性在堕胎法理学中的角色：从罗诉韦德案到凯西案及以后。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.
10
Two ships passing in the night: an interpretavist review of the White-Stevens colloquy on Roe v. Wade.夜中交错的两艘船：对怀特 - 史蒂文斯关于罗诉韦德案对话的诠释学回顾
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev. 1987;6(2):229-311.
本文引用的文献
1
Limiting state regulation of reproductive decisions.限制国家对生殖决策的管控。
Am J Public Health. 1984 Feb;74(2):168-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.2.168.
Zotero 插件