Ford D J, Raj P P, Singh P, Regan K M, Ohlweiler D
Anesthesiology. 1984 Jan;60(1):28-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198401000-00007.
Controversy still surrounds the differential susceptibility of nerve fibers to local anesthetic conduction block. In order to help resolve this controversy, we developed an in vivo model of peripheral nerve blockade in the cat that closely reproduced the clinical state. Using this model, differential rate of nerve blockade of A-alpha, A-delta, and C fibers by 2-chloroprocaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, and etidocaine was observed and quantitated. C fibers were blocked first by 2-chloroprocaine, lidocaine and bupivacaine. Etidocaine blocked A-delta fibers first. A-alpha fibers always were blocked last. Of the four local anesthetics tested, 2-chloroprocaine produced the greatest differential rate of block of the nerve fibers, and etidocaine produced the least.
神经纤维对局部麻醉传导阻滞的不同敏感性仍然存在争议。为了帮助解决这一争议,我们建立了一种猫外周神经阻滞的体内模型,该模型能密切再现临床状态。利用这个模型,观察并定量了2-氯普鲁卡因、利多卡因、布比卡因和依替卡因对A-α、A-δ和C纤维的不同神经阻滞速率。C纤维首先被2-氯普鲁卡因、利多卡因和布比卡因阻滞。依替卡因首先阻滞A-δ纤维。A-α纤维总是最后被阻滞。在测试的四种局部麻醉药中,2-氯普鲁卡因产生的神经纤维阻滞差异率最大,而依替卡因产生的差异率最小。